·论 著·

回顾性分析婴儿骨骺骨髓炎3种不同治疗方式对预后的影响

何明哲,孙一硕*,张 放,崔硬铁,甄 磊

(河北医科大学附属河北省儿童医院骨一科,河北 石家庄 050031)

[摘要] 目的分析骨骺骨髓炎3种不同治疗方式对预后的影响。方法选取确诊为骨骺骨髓炎的患儿90例,根据治疗方式分为3组各30例,A组行关节切开冲洗引流+干骺端钻孔减张术,B组行单纯冲洗引流术,C组未行手术治疗。随访时每组剩21例,比较各组治疗前后肩关节活动度(8例)、髋关节活动度(7例)和膝关节活动度(6例)以及住院时间和拔管时间。结果治疗后6个月,A组和B组肩关节的外展、前屈和后伸活动度、C组外展和后伸活动度均较治疗前明显增加,A组和B组肩关节外展、前屈和后伸活动度均较C组增加,A组又均较B组增加(P<0.05)。治疗后6个月,3组髋关节屈曲、外展和内收活动度均较治疗前明显增加,A组和B组髋关节屈曲、外展活动度均较C组增加(P<0.05)。治疗后6个月,3组膝关节活动度均较治疗前明显增加(P<0.05),但3组间膝关节活动度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组和B组住院时间少于C组,A组又少于B组,A组拔管时间少于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论行切开引流+干骺端钻孔减张术对于恢复患者的肩关节(外展、前屈和后伸)活动度、髋关节(屈曲、外展和内收)活动度和膝关节屈伸活动度有较好的疗效,且住院时间和拔管时间短,可以降低该疾病的致残率,提高患儿术后生活质量。

[关键词] 骨髓炎;骨骺;婴儿

骨骺骨髓炎是一种骨骺的感染性疾病,该疾病可造成骨骺早闭、骨坏死缺损、关节畸形等后果,婴儿在患病初期的临床表现不典型,常表现为低热、局部红肿、肢体假瘫等症状,容易误诊,可能会出现难以治愈的后遗畸形。目前手术方式多为关节切开冲洗引流+干骺端钻孔减张术、单纯关节冲洗引流。干骺端减张术是使用电钻及克氏针对干骺端行钻孔减张,之后在关节内置入引流管;封闭式冲洗引流术则不进行减张,只是清理坏死组织后,置入引流管。本研究回顾性分析骨骺骨髓炎的3种治疗方式,评估患儿的肢体功能恢复情况,旨在为临床诊治提供参考。

1 资料与方法

1.1 一般资料 选自2009—2016年我院确诊为骨骺骨髓炎的患儿90例,按治疗方式分为3组各30例,A组行关节切开冲洗引流+干骺端钻孔减张术,B组行单纯冲洗引流术,C组未行手术治疗。由于部分病例失随访以及数据测量不健全,最终每组剩21例,其中各含肩关节8例、髋关节7例、膝关节6例。血常规显示白细胞平均值为17.68×109/L,血沉平均值32.14 mm/1 h、C反应蛋白平均值68.35 mg/L,均高于正常值,且有病变部位红肿、关节疼痛、皮温升高、肢体活动受限等情况,体温波动于37.8~39.2 ℃之间。X线显示骨骺内密度不均匀、干骺端骨质密度减低,周围软组织肿胀。MRI显示关节间隙及周围软组织高信号,骨骺内可见片状低信号或高信号,干骺端可见高信号,并伴有周围脓肿形成。

1.2 方法 手术治疗前测量患儿关节的活动范围,手术方式为切开引流,将关节切开后,引流出脓液,并留取标本送细菌培养或病理检查,用生理盐水冲洗关节腔后,探查骨骺及干骺端的骨质情况,如骨骺颜色变暗或存在虫噬样改变,则在干骺端行钻孔减张,并将剪有侧孔的引流管置入关节腔内,固定引流管并缝合关节腔周围软组织。术后记录患儿拔管时间,并定期复查X线及血液生化指标,术后6个月复诊时再次测量患儿关节的活动范围。

1.3 统计学方法 应用PEMS 3.2医学统计软件分析数据。计量资料比较分别采用F检验、SNK-q检验、两独立样本的t检验和配对t检验。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。

2 结 果

2.1 3组治疗前后肩关节活动度比较 治疗前,3组外展、前屈和后伸活动度差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后6个月,A组和B组肩关节外展、前屈和后伸活动度,C组的外展和后伸活动度均较治疗前明显增加(P<0.05),A组和B组 外展、前屈和后伸活动度均较C组增加,A组又均较B组增加(P<0.05)。见表1,图1,2。

表1 3组治疗前后肩关节活动度比较
Table 1 Comparison of shoulder range of motion before and after treatment among three groups

组别外展治疗前治疗6个月前屈治疗前治疗6个月后伸治疗前治疗6个月A组34.6±9.1169.4±9.8∗#a82.9±6.5125.0±7.6∗#a34.1±4.277.3±6.1∗#aB组35.6±6.1147.1±5.4∗a82.6±3.8110.7±6.4∗a36.4±4.254.4±4.9∗aC组34.6±8.7144.2±8.3a85.6±5.585.2±6.034.6±5.451.8±4.7aF值0.6688.3140.3368.3140.13856.724P值0.5250.0030.7190.0030.8720.000

*P值<0.05与C组比较 #P值<0.05与B组比较(SNK-q检验) aP值<0.05 与治疗前比较(配对t检验)

图1 肱骨近端骨骺骨髓炎术前、术后6个月X线对比 A.术前X线显示肩关节周围软组织肿胀,肱骨近端干骺端及骨骺密度减低;B.术后6个月X线显示肱骨近端骨骺发育良好Figure 1 X-ray comparison of proximal humerus epiphyseal osteomyelitis before and 6 months after operation

图2 肱骨近端骨骺骨髓炎术前、术后6个月MRI对比

A.术前MRI显示肱骨近端及骨骺密度不均匀;B.术后6个月MRI显示肱骨近端仍存在密度不均匀,但骨骺发育良好

Figure 2 MRI comparison of proximal humerus epiphyseal osteomyelitis before and 6 months after operation

2.2 3组治疗前后髋关节活动度比较 治疗前,3组髋关节屈曲、外展和内收活动度差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后6个月,3组髋关节屈曲、外展和内收活动度均较治疗前明显增加,A组和B组屈曲、外展活动度均较C组增加(P<0.05),但3组内收活动度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。见表2,图3,4。

表2 3组治疗前后髋关节活动度比较
Table 2 Comparison of hip range of motion before and after treatment among three groups

组别屈曲治疗前治疗6个月外展治疗前治疗6个月内收治疗前治疗6个月A组84.3±6.3120.1±10.3∗a23.8±6.183.6±5.7∗a24.0±6.144.0±9.8aB组86.4±5.0111.7±8.3∗a25.1±5.682.2±8.3∗a25.4±4.642.6±6.3aC组82.2±8.686.0±6.5a22.6±5.468.8±8.2a25.2±5.437.0±10.3aF值0.66826.1550.3368.3140.1381.192P值0.5250.0000.7190.0030.8720.327

*P值<0.05与C组比较 #P值<0.05与B组比较(SNK-q检验) aP值<0.05与治疗前比较(配对t检验)

图3 股骨近端骨骺骨髓炎术前、术后6个月X线对比 A.术前X线显示股骨近端骨质密度不均匀,股骨头骨骺尚未萌出,关节间隙增宽,周围软组织肿胀;B.术后6个月X线显示股骨头已萌出,但有低密度线影,股骨头位置良好,股骨近端密度均匀 Figure 3 X-ray comparison of

proximal femoral epiphyseal osteomyelitis before and 6 months after operation

图4 股骨近端骨骺骨髓炎术前、术后6个月MRI对比

A.术前MRI显示股骨近端及骨骺密度不均匀,周围软组织高信号;B.术后6个月MRI显示股骨头及股骨近端密度较为均匀

Figure 4 MRI comparison of proximal femoral epiphyseal osteomyelitis before and 6 months after operation

2.3 3组治疗前后膝关节活动度、住院时间和拔管时间比较 治疗前,3组膝关节活动度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后6个月,3组膝关节活动度均较治疗前明显增加(P<0.05),但3组间膝关节活动度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组和B组住院时间均少于C组,A组又少于B组,A组拔管时间少于B组(P<0.05)。见表3,图5,6。

表3 3组治疗前后膝关节活动度以及住院时间和 拔管时间比较
Table 3 Comparison of knee joint of motion before and after treatment length of hospital stay and extubation among three groups

组别膝关节活动度(°)治疗前治疗6个月住院时间(d)拔管时间(d)A组82.4±9.2153.6±8.4a21.7±4.9∗#10.6±2.7B组84.5±5.6147.9±10.3a29.7±3.4∗17.6±3.1C组82.0±9.8142.8±9.4a35.2±3.8-F/t值0.1531.98316.5874.171P值0.8590.1720.0000.002

*P值<0.05与C组比较 #P值<0.05与B组比较(SNK-q检验) aP值<0.05与治疗前比较(配对t检验)

图5 股骨远端骨骺骨髓炎术前、术后6个月X线对比A.术前X线显示股骨远端干骺端及骨骺密度不均匀,关节间隙增宽,软组织肿胀;B.术后6个月股骨远端骨骺增大,关节间隙正常,骨骺密度不均匀 Figure 5 X-ray comparison of osteomyelitis of distal femoral epiphysis before and 6 months after operation

图6 股骨远端骨骺骨髓炎术前、术后6个月MRI对比

A.术前MRI显示股骨远端干骺端及骨骺密度不均匀,可见高信号影;B.术后6个月股骨远端干骺端高信号影消失,骨骺密度不均匀,但高信号影显著减弱

Figure 6 MRI comparison of osteomyelitis of distal femoral epiphysis before and 6 months after operation

3 讨 论

骨骺是儿童出生后在不同的时间内出现的二次骨化中心,骺板又称为生长板,其发生较长骨本身晚,稍迟于骨骺的发育。骺板可根据组织学及功能特点分为静止层、增殖层、肥大层。其中静止层与二次骨化中心相邻,此区域相对无明显活动性,故不参与骨质的纵向生长,但是可以产生基质以及具有储备的功能。增殖层是软骨细胞复制和生长区域,此区域代谢率较高,血氧和糖原供应丰富,三磷酸腺苷和骨胶原可使骨骼快速生长[1]。肥大层有肥大的软骨细胞,随着软骨细胞的增大,为钙化作准备。干骺端是血管、骨形成和再塑性的区域,该部位清除了钙化的基质,形成编织骨,并由板状骨代替。骨质的末端包括骺板和干骺端,是最容易发生感染、肿瘤、骨折等损伤的部位。骺板的血运来源于骺血管、干骺端血管、软骨周围血管。干骺端的血管主要来自于营养动脉[2],软骨周围的小血管也支配干骺端的边缘部分,这两个血运的终端形成血管襻,小的静脉襻末端形成静脉窦。在生后数个月内存在跨骺板的血管,此血管于干骺端血管形成吻合支,二次骨化中心形成和长大后则很少见到跨骺板的血管,是因为此时已有软骨下骨板形成[3]

手术方法是切开引流、钻孔减张。病灶部位的骨骺、干骺端及周围软组织已经受到了炎症的破坏,手术中更不要大范围地剥离骨膜,以免影响骨皮质的血运。干骺端钻孔需要选择适当型号的克氏针,本研究中提到的钻孔减张,针对1岁以内的儿童使用的是2.0 mm或1.6 mm的克氏针,如较大型号的克氏针会消弱病骨的硬度[4],由于病灶部位炎症的存在,会出现骨质不愈合[5],甚至可以导致严重的病理性骨折,如果出现病理性骨折,骨质愈合过程将会很漫长[6]。有时可以通过术中C形臂透视进行局部的定位,以求更准确的钻孔部位。在手术操作过程中要避免损伤骺板,如果进一步损伤骺板,会对患儿日后功能恢复及肢体发育造成较大影响。手术钻孔减张可以有效地减轻干骺端的压力,有利于感染控制,同时降低骨髓腔内的压力,促进病变部位的血液循环,也可以减少血栓形成的机会[7],这样对病变部位的抗生素有效浓度是有利的。在清理病灶部位坏死组织及脓液后,用生理盐水反复冲洗,留取坏死组织和脓液送细菌培养+药敏,之后将引流管置入关节内,用于持续冲洗引流[8]

行关节切开冲洗引流+干骺端钻孔减张术的患儿中,术后拔除引流管时间10~18 d,住院时间14~27 d,其中血培养或脓液培养均为阳性。行关节冲洗引流的患儿中,有部分患儿血培养或脓液培养为阴性,考虑与入院之前已行抗生素治疗有关[9-10],术后拔除引流管时间16~27 d,住院26~34 d。本研究结果显示,对于肩关节、髋关节及膝关节的功能恢复,行切开引流+干骺端钻孔减张术的患儿好于单纯行切开引流术的患儿。通过对比研究,切开引流+干骺端钻孔减张,可以有效地缩短冲洗引流的时间、拔除引流管,减少患儿的痛苦,有助于病情的恢复。缩短引流管拔除时间,一期缝合伤口,可缩短疗程及住院时间,对防治院内交叉感染、改善局部血运供应、预防骨组织坏死、降低致残率等均有帮助[11-12]。未行手术治疗的患儿,其中大部分血培养或脓液培养为阴性,这与入院之前已行相关治疗有关[13-14],该组患儿在入院时骨骺已经受到不可逆的破坏,且患儿体温及局部症状均无明显异常,此时手术已无意义[15-16]。其住院时间31~40 d。6个月之后随诊,肩关节、髋关节及膝关节功能虽均有所恢复,但较行手术治疗的患儿仍有较大的差距。

本研究还对 3组患儿的术后拔管时间、住院时间及关节活动范围进行了比较,行关节切开冲洗引流+骨骺及干骺端钻孔减张术的A组可以有效减轻干骺端张力,充分引流,刺激干骺端血运恢复,患儿住院时间及术后拔管时间明显缩短,术后长期随诊,肩关节、髋关节及膝关节功能恢复程度好于单纯行切开引流术的B组患儿和未行手术治疗的C组患儿。

本研究结果提示,对于已出现化脓性表现的骨骺骨髓炎患儿,除了及时明确诊断、足量足疗程使用抗生素之外,积极行外科手术治疗亦显得尤为重要。手术方式为关节切开引流+干骺端钻孔减张,该术式可以有效减轻骨骺及干骺端的压力,并使病灶部位得到较为充分的引流,从而促进疾病的恢复、缩短疗程,并降低该疾病的致残率。

[参考文献]

[1] Hwang HJ,Jeong WK,Lee DH,et al.Acute primary hematogenous osteomyelitis in the epiphysis of the distal tibia:a case report with review of the literature[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg,2016,55(3):600-604.

[2] Ceroni D,Belaieff W,Cherkaoui A,et al. Primary epiphyseal or apophyseal subacute osteomyelitis in the pediatric population: a report of fourteen cases and a systematic review of the literature[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2014,96(18):1570-1575.

[3] 施莺燕,帕米尔,马瑞雪,等.小儿长骨骨髓炎的MRI表现[J].放射学实践,2014,29(8):880-884.

[4] Pandey PK,Pawar I,Gupta J. Physeal separation and complete resorption of femoral head associated with chronic osteomyelitis of femoral diaphysis in a young child: rare case report[J]. J Pediatr Orthop B,2016,25(6):529-532.

[5] Goto T,Nemoto T,Ogura K,et al. Eosinophilic granuloma of the capital femoral epiphysis[J]. J Pediatr Orthop B,2011,20(3):157-161.

[6] Newquist JM,Baxter GM. Evaluation of plasma fibrinogen concentration as an indicator of physeal or epiphyseal osteomyelitis in foals:17 cases(2002-2007)[J]. J Am Vet Med Assoc,2009,235(4):415-419.

[7] Mellado Santos JM. Diagnostic imaging of pediatric hematogenous osteomyelitis:lessons learned from a multi-modality approach[J]. Eur Radiol,2006,16(9):2109-2119.

[8] Gilbertson-Dahdal D,Wright JE,Krupinski E. Transphyseal involvement of pyogenic osteomyelitis is considerably more common than classically taught[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol,2014,203(1):190-195.

[9] Song KM,Boatright KC,Drassler J,et a1. The use of polymerase chain reaction for the detection and speciation of bacterial bone and joint infection in children[J]. J Pediatr Orthop,2009,29(2):182-188.

[10] Kao HK,YangWE,Shih HN,et al. Physeal change after tuberculous osteomyelitis of the long hone in children[J]. Chang Gung Med J,2010,33(4):453-460.

[11] Schallert EK,Kan JH,Monsalve J. Metaphyseal osteomyelitis in children: how often does MRI-documented joint effusion or epiphyseal extension of edema indicate coexisting septic arthritis[J]. Pediatr Radiol,2015,45(8):1174-1181.

[12] Shaikh MJ,Rex C,Vignesh R. Slipped distal femoral epiphysis in congenital insensitivity to pain[J]. J Orthop Case Rep,2016,6(2):78-80.

[13] 苏江宁,赵晓勇,许丽霞,等.中西医结合治疗小儿急性骨髓炎165例[J].河北医科大学学报,2009,30(9):966-967.

[14] Agarwal A,Gupta N,Mishra M. Primary epiphyseal and metaepiphyseal tubercular osteomyelitis in children A series of 8 case[J]. Acta Orthop Belg,2016,82(4):797-805.

[15] Gümüstas SA,Cagirmaz T,Orak MM. Cystic tuberculosis osteomyelitis of the distal tibia in infancy[J]. Turk Pediatri Ars,2017,52(1):53-56.

[16] Yoo WJ,Choi IH,Yun YH,et al. Primary epiphyseal osteomyelitis caused by mycobacterium species in otherwise healthy toddlers[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2014,96(17):e145.

Retrospective analysis of the effects of three different treatments on the prognosis of infant epiphysis osteomyelitis

HE Ming-zhe, SUN Yi-shuo*, ZHANG Fang, CUI Ying-tie, ZHEN Lei

(The First Department of Orthpedics, Affiliated Hebei Childrens Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

Abstract Objective To analyze the effect of three different treatment methods on the prognosis of epiphyseal osteomyelitis. Methods Infans with epiphyseal osteomyelitis were selected and divided into three groups according to the treatment methods: group A underwent arthrotomy and drill,and group B underwent arthrotomy. Group C did not undergo surgery treatment group as a control group. At the time of follow-up, 21 cases remained in each group. The shoulder joint activity(n=8), hip joint activity(n=7) and knee joint activity(n=6) as well as hospitalization and extubation time were compared before and after treatment. Results Six months after treatment, the range of shoulder joint abduction, flexion and extension in group A and group B, and the range of shoulder joint abduction and extension in group C were increased significantly compared with that before treatment(P<0.05). Six months after treatment, the range of shoulder joint abduction, flexion and extension in group A and group B were increased compared with that in group C, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Six months after treatment, the range of shoulder joint abduction, flexion and extension in group A was higher than that in group B(P<0.05). The flexion, abduction and adduction of the hip joint in group A and B were significantly higher than those in group C(P<0.05), and the flexion and abduction of the hip joint in group A and B were significantly higher than those in group C(P<0.05). After 6 months of treatment, the knee joint activity in three groups was significantly higher than that before treatment(P<0.05), but after 6 months of treatment, there was no statistical difference in knee joint activity among the three groups. Learning significance(P>0.05), the hospitalization time of group A and B was less than that of group C, group A was less than that of group B, and the extubation time of group A was less than that of group B, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Arthrotomy and drilling is effective in restoring shoulder joint(abduction, flexion and extension), hip joint (flexion, abduction and adduction) and knee joint flexion and extension, and shorter hospitalization and extubation time can reduce the disability rate of the disease and improve the quality of life of infan after operation.

[Key words] osteomyelitis; epiphyses; infan

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2019.05.010

[收稿日期]2018-06-28;[修回日期]2018-08-08

[基金项目]河北省医学科学研究重点课题(20150570)

[作者简介]何明哲(1981-),男,满族,河北承德人,河北医科大学附属河北省儿童医院主治医师,医学硕士,从事小儿骨科疾病诊治研究。

*通信作者。E-mail:979858998@qq.com

[中图分类号] R681.2

[文献标志码]A

[文章编号]1007-3205(2019)05-0533-05

(本文编辑:许卓文)