Journal of Hebei Medical University

Previous Articles     Next Articles

A retrospective clinical comparative analysis study on the surgical method of low rectal neuroendocrine tumors#br#

  

  1. 1.Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tangshan People′s Hospital, Hebei Province, Tangshan
    063000, China; 2.Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing University
    People′s Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Online:2018-05-25 Published:2018-05-30

Abstract: [Abstract] Objective〖HTSS〗〓To observe and compare the efficacy and safety of the endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM) in the treatment of lower rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Methods〖HTSS〗〓Eightynine patients(grades G1 and G2) with lowgrade rectal neuroendocrine tumors(≤7 cm from the anus) were included in this study. Thirtyfive patients were treated with ESD and fiftyfour patients were treated with TEM. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, average hospital stay were compared, And complete resection rate, perforation, and postoperative recurrence rate were followed up for 5 years after operation.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Results〖HTSS〗〓The intraoperative blood loss of the patients in the TEM group was less than that in ESD group(P<005). The operative time and the hospital stay of the patients in the TEM group were shorter than those in ESD group(P<005). There was no difference in complete resection rate, perforation, and postoperative recurrence rate between the two groups(P>005).
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖HTSS〗〓Compared with TEM has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operative time, and shorter hospital stay,and is worthy of clinical promotion.

Key words: colorectal neoplasms, endoscopic submucosal dissection, transanal endoscopic microsurgery