不同方法修复磨牙大面积缺损的疗效比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2020.03.019

河北医科大学学报

不同方法修复磨牙大面积缺损的疗效比较

上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院崇明分院口腔科，上海 202150

出版日期:2020-03-25 发布日期:2020-04-02
作者简介:刘雪梅(1976-)，女，江西吉安人，上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院崇明分院主治医师，医学学士，从事口腔疾病诊治研究。

Comparison of the effects of different methods on repairing large area defects of molars

Department of Dental, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Chongming branch， Shanghai 202150, China

Online:2020-03-25 Published:2020-04-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： ［摘要］
目的探讨钴铬合金烤瓷嵌体、钴铬合金烤瓷全冠和二氧化锆全瓷嵌体修复磨牙大面积缺损的疗效。
方法选取磨牙大面积缺损患者98例共120颗，根据临床修复方式不同，将其分为钴铬合金烤瓷嵌体修复组、钴铬合金烤瓷全冠修复组和二氧化锆全瓷嵌体修复组，各40颗，患牙修复后1年复诊观察修复效果。
结果钴铬合金烤瓷嵌体修复组在修复体固位稳定性方面明显优于钴铬合金烤瓷全冠修复组（P＜0.05）。钴铬合金烤瓷全冠修复组在修复体完整性、继发龋方面明显优于氧化锆全瓷嵌体修复组（P＜0.05）。钴铬合金烤瓷嵌体修复组在修复体完整性、边缘密合度、颜色匹配性、继发龋方面明显优于二氧化锆全瓷嵌体修复组（P＜0.05）。
结论钴铬合金烤瓷嵌体和钴铬合金烤瓷全冠修复磨牙大面积缺损的疗效明显优于二氧化锆全瓷嵌体修复，且钴铬合金烤瓷嵌体修复在固位稳定性方面效果更佳，更适合磨牙大面积缺损的修复。

关键词: 磨牙, 二氧化锆全瓷嵌体, 钴铬合金烤瓷嵌体

Abstract: ［Abstract］ ObjectiveTo investigate the curative effect of cobalt-chrome alloy inlayed porcelain crown, cobalt-chromium alloy porcelain crown and zirconia all-ceramic inlay.
〖WTHZ〗MethodsA total of 120 patients with large area defects were treated with a total of 98 patients with a large area defect. According to the random number table method, it was divided into cobalt-chromium alloy high-inlay porcelain crown repair group, cobalt-chromium alloy porcelain crown restoration group and zirconium dioxide all-ceramic inlay repair group, each group of 40, suffering from dental restoration after one year visit to observe the repair effect.
〖WTHZ〗ResultsThe chrome-chrome-coated porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns were better than those of cobalt-chromium alloy porcelain crowns(P＜0.05). Cobalt chromium alloy porcelain crown repair group was superior to zirconia all-ceramic inlay repair group in restoration body integrity, secondary caries and color matching(P＜0.05). The effect of Cobalt-chrome-based high-embedded porcelain-fused-to-metal crown restoration group was better than that of zirconia all-ceramic inlay repair group(P＜0.05).
〖WTHZ〗ConclusionThe effect of cobalt-chrome-plated inlay porcelain crown and cobalt-chromium alloy porcelain crown are better than that of zirconia all-ceramic inlay repair, and cobalt-chrome-based inlay retention stability in terms of better results, more suitable for repair of large area defects after the molar.

Key words: molar, zirconia all porcelain inlay, cobalt chrome alloy high inlay porcelain crown

刘雪梅，邱晓峰*. 不同方法修复磨牙大面积缺损的疗效比较[J]. 河北医科大学学报, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2020.03.019.

LIU Xue-mei， QIU Xiao-feng*. Comparison of the effects of different methods on repairing large area defects of molars[J]. Journal of Hebei Medical University, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2020.03.019.

[1]	冯一帆, 吕炳建, 平雅坤. 不同麻醉方式下乳磨牙iRoot BP Plus牙髓切断术疗效观察[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(3): 355-357,372.
[2]	吴泽琳. 上颌第二磨牙颊侧骨皮质区植入种植钉推磨牙向远中移动效果观察[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 197-200,213.
[3]	王雪涛，李璁，李芳凝. 截冠留根法拔除下颌第三磨牙时对下牙槽神经损伤的影响[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2020, 41(5): 579-581,586.
[4]	郝军红. 壳聚糖明胶海绵对下颌阻生智齿拔除后生活质量的影响[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 1031-1031.
[5]	卢宇;杨枫;严齐会. 二氧化锆全瓷冠修复效果的长期临床研究[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 676-676.
[6]	甲成;李有名;王大维. 改良摆式矫治器远中移动磨牙的临床观察[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 920-920.
[7]	张旭东;董福生;栗兴超;任贵云;陈瑞雪. 远中纵劈法在拔除下颌水平阻生第三磨牙中的应用[J]. , 2007, 28(6): 446-446.
[8]	. 银汞桩核保存完全纵裂磨牙的临床体会[J]. , 2006, 27(4): 288-288.
[9]	洪秀珍. 下颌磨牙分根术68例报告[J]. , 2004, 25(z1): 38-38.
[10]	刘冬梅;冯东光;李淑娟. 乳磨牙窝沟封闭3年临床效果分析(附382例报告)[J]. , 2003, 24(3): 164-164.
[11]	周建军. 盲袋内置药治疗下颌智齿冠周炎80例[J]. , 2000, 21(4): 207-207.

不同方法修复磨牙大面积缺损的疗效比较

Comparison of the effects of different methods on repairing large area defects of molars

HTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价