河北医科大学学报

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

低剂量胸部DR的临床应用研究#br#

  

  1. 1.河北医科大学第二医院医学影像科,河北 石家庄 050000;2.河北省放射医学研究所防护科,河北 石家庄 050000
  • 出版日期:2018-11-25 发布日期:2018-11-21
  • 作者简介:张信起(1966-),男,河北无极人,河北医科大学第二医院副主任技师,医学学士,从事医学影像诊断研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省科技计划项目(162777277)

Clinical application of low dose chest DR

  1. 1.Departmen of Medical Image, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
    050000, China; 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Hebei Institute of Radiology, Shijiazhuang 050000,China
  • Online:2018-11-25 Published:2018-11-21

摘要: [摘要]〓
〖HTH〗目的〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗探讨一种具有可操作性的胸部数字化X线摄影(digital  radiography,DR)低剂量的检查方法。
〖HTH〗方法〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗选取需行胸部DR检查的500例患者按其胸部厚度分为5组:A组(体厚H≤20 cm) 100例、B组(体厚H>20~22 cm)110例、C组(体厚 H>22~25 cm)100例、D组(体厚H>25~27 cm)90例、E组(体厚H>27 cm)100例。A、B、C、D、E再随机分为:手控组A1组(50例)、B1组(55例)、C1组(50例)、D1组(45例)、E1组(50例);自控曝光组A2组(50例)、B2组(55例)、C2组(50例)、D2组(45例)、E2组(50例)。手控组曝光条件为A1组102 kV/0.8 mAs、B1组109 kV/0.8 mAs、 C1组117 kV/0.8 mAs 、D1组125 kV/0.8 mAs、E1组133 kV/1 mAs,自控组曝光条件均为125 kV/0.7~3 mAs,其余成像参数相同。辐射剂量由剂量计测量,对每例图像进行质量评分、噪声评价。对所有胸片右上肺野、膈下,空曝区行光密度测定。
〖HTH〗结果〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗A1、B1、C1、D1、E1组平均辐射剂量明显低于A2、B2、C2、D2、E2组,差异有统计学意义(P<005)。 A1组较A2组、B1组较B2组、C1组较C2组、D1组较D2组、E1组较E2组图像质量评分、噪声评价、胸片光密度差异均无统计学意义(P>005)。
〖HTH〗结论〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗在胸部DR检查中,根据患者胸部厚度设置曝光条件、优化曝光参数后,患者接受的辐射剂量明显减低,但图像质量仍能保证,故此方法值得推广应用。

关键词: 放射摄影术, 胸部, 低剂量

Abstract: [Abstract]〓Objective〖HTSS〗〓To explore an operable digital radiography(DR) lowdose examination method.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Methods〖HTSS〗〓A total of 500 patients who underwent chest DR examination were enrolled. The patients were divided into 5 groups according to their chest thickness. Group A(body thickness H≤20 cm) 100 cases, group B(body thickness H>20-22 cm)110 cases, group C(body thickness H>22-25 cm )100 cases, group D(body thickness H>25-27 cm)90 cases, group E(body thickness H>27 cm)100 cases. A, B, C, D and E were randomly divided into manual control group A1 group(50 cases), B1 group(55 cases), C1 group(50 cases), D1 group(45 cases), E1 group(50 cases). Automatic exposure control(AEC) group A2 group(50 cases), B2 group(55 cases), C2 group(50 cases), D2 group(45 cases), E2 group(50 cases). Manual control group exposure conditions are A1 group 102 kV/0.8 mAs, B1 group 109 kV/0.8 mAs, C1 group 117 kV/0.8 mAs, D1 group 125 kV/0.8 mAs, E1 group 133 kV/1 mAs, AEC group exposure conditions are 125 kV/0.7-3 mAs, other imaging parameters are the same. The radiation dose was measured by a dosimeter. Quality scoring and noise evaluation were performed for each image. For all chest radiographs, the right upper lung field, beneath edge of diaphragm, and background exposure area were measured for optical density.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Results〖HTSS〗〓The average radiation dose of group A1, B1, C1, D1 and E1 was significantly lower than that of A2, B2, C2, D2 and E2 groups, and the difference was statistically significant(P<005). There was no significant difference in the image quality score, noise evaluation, and chest Xray density between the manual control group(A1, B1, C1, D1 and E1) and the AEC group(A2, B2, C2, D2 and E2)(P>005).
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖HTSS〗〓In the chest DR examination, the radiation dose received by the patient is significantly reduced by setting the exposure conditions and optimizing the exposure parameters according to the patient′s chest thickness, and the image quality can still be guaranteed, so this method is worth of promotion.

Key words: radiography, thorax, low dose