河北医科大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 787-791.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2022.07.009

• • 上一篇    下一篇

内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗早期胃癌非治愈性切除相关危险因素分析

  

  1. 河北医科大学第二医院消化内科,河北 石家庄 050000

  • 出版日期:2022-07-25 发布日期:2022-07-26
  • 作者简介:周璇(1994-),女,江苏宿迁人,江南大学附属医院北院区医师,医学硕士,从事消化内镜诊治研究。
  • 基金资助:
    京津冀基础研究合作专项项目(H2018206450);河北省适宜卫生技术推广项目(2018006)

Analysis of risk factors related to non-curable resection of early gastric cancer by endoscopic submucosal dissection

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China

  • Online:2022-07-25 Published:2022-07-26

摘要: 目的 评估内镜黏膜下剥离术(endoscopic submucosal dissection,ESD)治疗早期胃癌(early gastric cancer,EGC)的有效性及安全性,了解非治愈性切除的相关危险因素及预后情况。
方法 收集接受ESD治疗的EGC患者的相关临床资料及随访预后情况,分为治愈性切除组和非治愈性切除组。
结果 纳入99例患者,40岁后病例数明显增多,65岁左右达到高峰,病变直径(2.32±1.73) cm,病变部位以位于胃上1/3为主。整块切除 99例(100.0%),完全切除 79例(79.8%),治愈性切除71例(71.7%)。治愈性切除组与非治愈性切除组病变直径、术后病理、浸润深度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析,结果显示,术后病理、浸润深度是非治愈性切除的危险因素(P<0.05)。术后随访,进行eCura评分分层的患者中,8例追加外科手术,3例低风险组,5例中风险组,其中1例发现局部癌残留及区域淋巴结转移属于中风险组。
结论 对EGC患者进行术前评估时应更加注意病变直径、术前病理分型及浸润深度的判断,把握适应证标准。非治愈性切除患者术后治疗方案或许可参考eCura评分系统。

关键词: 胃肿瘤, 内窥镜黏膜切除术, 非治愈性切除

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) in the treatment of early gastric cancer(EGC), and to understand the related risk factors and prognosis of non-curative resection(nCuR). 
Methods The relevant clinical data and follow-up prognosis of EGC patients who received ESD were collected, and they were divided into curative resection(CuR) and nCuR groups. 
Results Among the 99 patients included,the number of cases aged 40 years or older increased significantly, and reached a peak around the age of 65. The diameter of the lesion was (2.32±1.73) cm, and the lesions were mainly located in the upper third of the stomach(70.7%). En-bloc resection was performed in 99 cases(100.0%), complete resection in 79 cases(79.8%), and curative resection in 71 cases(71.7%). There were statistical differences in lesion diameter, postoperative pathology and depth of invasion in the CuR and nCuR groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that postoperative pathology and depth of invasion were risk factors for nCuR(P<0.05).According to the follow-up after ESD, among the patients who underwent stratification of eCura scoring system, 8 had additional surgery, 3 were in the low-risk group, and 5 were in the moderate-risk group; 1 patient who was found to have local cancer residue and regional lymph node metastasis was classified as moderate risk. 
Conclusion In preoperative evaluation of EGC patients, more attention should be paid to the judgment of lesion diameter, preoperative pathological type and depth of invasion, and the indication standard should be fully understood. The treatment plan for patients with nCuR may refer to the eCura scoring system. 

Key words: stomach neoplasms, endoscopic mucosal resection, non-curative resection