河北医科大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (12): 1407-1411,1422.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2022.12.008

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不同浓度罗哌卡因PENG阻滞用于老年股骨头置换术后多模式镇痛的效果

  

  1. 汕头大学医学院第二附属医院麻醉科,广东 汕头515041

  • 出版日期:2022-12-25 发布日期:2023-01-11
  • 作者简介:吴少坪(1986-),男,广东饶平人,汕头大学医学院第二附属医院主治医师,医学硕士,从事临床麻醉学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    汕头市医疗卫生科技计划项目(汕府科[2020]58号41)

Effect of different concentrations of ropivacaine for PENG block on multimodal analgesia after femoral head replacement in the elderly

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College of Shantou University, Guangdong Province, Shantou City, 515041, China 
  • Online:2022-12-25 Published:2023-01-11

摘要: 目的 本研究旨在比较不同浓度罗哌卡因PENG阻滞(hip pericapsular nerve group,PENG)用于老年股骨头置换术后多模式镇痛的效果,探索最适宜罗哌卡因浓度。
方法 选择在我院择期行股骨头置换术患者60例,随机分为低浓度罗哌卡因组(L组)、中浓度罗哌卡因组(M组)、高浓度罗哌卡因组(H组),每组20例。3组患者均采用PENG阻滞联合小剂量罗哌卡因蛛网膜下腔阻滞,在蛛网膜下腔阻滞实施前30 min进行PENG阻滞,术后均采用静脉自控镇痛。PENG阻滞时L组注射0.25%罗哌卡因20 mL,M组注射0.375%罗哌卡因20 mL,H组注射0.5%罗哌卡因20 mL。记录3组患者入室时、体位摆放前即刻、体位摆放时、体位摆放后即刻的疼痛疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analog scale,VAS)评分;记录3组患者术后6、12、24、48 h静息和运动疼痛VAS评分;记录3组患者首次按压镇痛泵时间、48 h内按压镇痛泵总次数、氟比洛芬酯补救镇痛例数;记录3组患者麻醉镇痛不良反应发生情况。
结果 在入室时、体位摆放前即刻、体位摆放时、体位摆放后即刻时3组患者疼痛VAS评分逐渐降低随后升高,时点间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),组间、组间·时点间交互作用差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);L组患者静息和运动疼痛VAS评分先升后降,M组和H组患者静息和运动疼痛VAS评分先降后升,M组、H组患者在术后12 h、24 h静息和运动疼痛VAS评分较L组明显降低,3组组间、时点间、组间·时点间交互作用差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);与L组比较,M组、H组患者首次按压镇痛泵时间明显延长(P<0.05),48h内按压镇痛泵总次数明显减少(P<0.05);3组患者氟比洛芬酯补救镇痛例数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);3组患者均未发生麻醉镇痛不良反应发生情况。
结论 不同浓度罗哌卡因PENG阻滞能降低老年股骨头置换术患者摆放侧卧位时疼痛VAS评分,降低术后疼痛VAS评分。与0.25%罗哌卡因比较,0.375%和0.5%罗哌卡因镇痛效果更佳,持续时间更长,减少术后镇痛药物应用,两者效果相近,但考虑安全性建议使用0.375%罗哌卡因。


关键词: 股骨头, 罗哌卡因, 镇痛

Abstract: Objective To compare the effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine for hip pericapsular nerve group(PENG) block on multimodal analgesia after femoral head replacement in the elderly, and to explore the most appropriate concentration of ropivacaine. 
Methods Sixty patients who underwent elective femoral head replacement in our hospital were selected. They were randomly divided into low concentration ropivacaine group(group L), medium concentration ropivacaine group(group M) and high concentration ropivacaine group(group H), with 20 cases in each group. They were treated with PENG block combined with low-dose ropivacaine subarachnoid block. PENG block was performed at 30 min before subarachnoid block. Patient controlled intravenous analgesia was used after operation. During PENG block, group L was injected with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine, group M with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine and group H with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. The pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of the three groups were recorded immediately after entering the operation room, immediately before, during and immediately after postural placement. VAS pain scores at rest and during exercise at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after operation were recorded. The time of pressing the analgesic pump for the first time, the total number of pressing the analgesic pump within 48 h and the number of cases of remedial analgesia with flurbiprofen axetil were recorded. The adverse reactions of anesthesia and analgesia in the three groups were recorded. 
Results VAS pain scores in the three groups decreased gradually and then increased immediately after entering the operation room, immediately before, during and immediately after postural placement, and the difference between time points was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in interaction between groups, and time points between groups (P>0.05). The VAS pain score at rest and during exercise in group L increased initially and then decreased, which, however, decreased initially and then increased in group M and H. Compared with group L, the VAS pain scores at rest and during exercise in group M and group H decreased significantly at 12 h and 24 h after operation (P<0.05). There were significant differences in interaction between groups, time points, and time points between groups (P<0.05). Compared with group L, the time of pressing the analgesic pump for the first time in group M and group H was significantly prolonged (P<0.05), and the total number of pressing the analgesic pump within 48 h was significantly reduced (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of cases of remedial analgesia with flurbiprofen axetil among the three groups (P>0.05). No adverse reaction of anesthesia and analgesia occurred in the three groups. 
Conclusion Different concentrations of ropivacaine for PENG block can reduce the VAS pain score of elderly patients undergoing femoral head replacement in lateral position and reduce the postoperative VAS pain score. Compared with 0.25% ropivacaine, 0.375% and 0.5% ropivacaine have better analgesic effect and longer duration, and reduce the application of postoperative analgesic drugs. Their effects are similar, but considering the safety, 0.375% ropivacaine is recommended.


Key words: femur head, ropivacaine, analgesia