河北医科大学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 589-595.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2023.05.018

• • 上一篇    下一篇

加速康复外科在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者中的应用

  

  1. 河北中石油中心医院麻醉科,河北 廊坊 065000

  • 出版日期:2023-05-25 发布日期:2023-05-25
  • 作者简介:张敏(1984-),女,河南郑州人,河北中石油中心医院主治医师,医学学士,从事临床麻醉学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    廊坊市科学技术研究与发展计划项目(2021013149)

Application of enhanced rehabilitation after surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Hebei Petro China Central Hospital, Hebei Province, Langfang 065000, China

  • Online:2023-05-25 Published:2023-05-25

摘要: 目的 探讨加速康复外科(enhanced recovery surgery,ERAS)在腹腔镜胆囊切除(laparoscopic Cholecystectomy,LC)患者中应用的临床意义。
方法 选取择期LC手术治疗的患者85例,采用随机数字表分为ERAS组43例、对照组42例;2组均采用右美托咪定辅助麻醉,ERAS组同时采用基于ERAS理念的保温、团队化干预措施;比较2组术后疼痛评分、患者的睡眠质量、应激反应及炎症因子水平、麻醉相关不良反应。
结果 2组静息状态下视觉模拟疼痛量表(visual analogue pain scale,VAS)评分均呈现先增高后降低的趋势,ERAS组低于对照组,2组咳嗽状态下VAS评分均一直降低,ERAS组低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后24 h,2组N1、N2、觉醒指数均高于术前,N3、快速眼动睡眠(rapid eye movement sleep,REM)、睡眠效率均低于术前,ERAS组N1、觉醒指数均低于对照组,REM、睡眠效率值均高于对照组(P<0.05)。术后24 h,2组去甲肾上腺素(norepinephrine,NE)、皮质醇(cortisol,Cor)、白细胞介素6(interleukin-6,IL-6)、C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)水平均高于术前,ERAS组NE、IL-6低于对照组(P<0.05)。ERAS组丙泊酚用量低于对照组,苏醒时间短于对照组,PCA按压次数少于对照组(P<0.05)。ERAS组的麻醉不良反应发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。
结论 ERAS在LC患者中应用有利于减轻患者术后疼痛水平、炎症应激反应、改善患者的睡眠质量。


关键词: 胆囊切除术, 腹腔镜, 加速康复外科, 右美托咪定

Abstract: Objective To explore the clinical significance of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). 
Methods Eighty-five patients who underwent selective LC surgery in Hebei Petro China Central Hospital were selected, and divided into ERAS group (n=43) and control group (n=42) by random number table method. Both groups of patients were given demedetomidine-assisted anesthesia. In the meantime, ERAS group was given thermal insulation and team-based interventions based on the ERAS concept. The postoperative pain score, sleep quality, stress response and inflammatory factor levels, and anesthesia-related adverse reactions were compared between two groups. 
Results The scores of the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) in both groups at rest showed a trend of increasing initially and then decreasing, which were lower in the ERAS group than in the control group, and the VAS scores in both groups were consistently lower during cough, which were lower in the ERAS group than in the control group (P<0.05). At 24 h after surgery, N1, N2, and arousal index in both groups were higher than those before surgery, while N3, rapid eye movement sleep (REM), and sleep efficiency were lower than those before surgery. N1 and arousal index in ERAS group were lower than those in control group, while REM and sleep efficiency values were higher than those in control group (P<0.05). At 24 h after surgery, the levels of norepinephrine (NE), cortisol (Cor), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the two groups were higher than those before surgery, while the levels of NE and IL-6 in the ERAS group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The dosage of propofol in ERAS group was lower than that in the control group, the awakening time was shorter, and the number of PCA compression was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse anesthetic reactions in ERAS group was lower than that in control group (P<0.05). 
Conclusion The application of ERAS in LC patients is conductive to reducing the postoperative pain level and inflammatory stress reaction and improving the sleep quality of patients. 


Key words: cholecystectomy, laparoscopic, enhanced recovery after surgery, demedetomidine