河北医科大学学报

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

创伤失血性休克应用不同液体复苏的抢救疗效及对免疫功能和电解质水平的影响

  

  1. 攀枝花学院附属医院急诊科,四川 攀枝花 617000
  • 出版日期:2019-02-25 发布日期:2019-01-16
  • 作者简介:涂攀(1982-),男,四川米易人,攀枝花学院附属医院主治医师,医学学士,从事急诊医学研究。

The effect of resuscitation of traumatic hemorrhagic shock with different fluid resuscitation and its effect on immune function and electrolyte level

  1. Department of Emergency, Affiliated Hospital of Panzhihua University, Sichuan Province, Panzhihua 617000, China
  • Online:2019-02-25 Published:2019-01-16

摘要: [摘要]〓
〖HTH〗目的〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗观察创伤失血性休克应用不同液体复苏的抢救疗效及对免疫功能和电解质水平的影响。
〖HTH〗方法〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗选取创伤失血性休克患者120例,按照入院顺序随机分为限制组(应用限制性液体复苏抢救方法,40例)、高渗盐组(应用高渗盐液体复苏抢救方法,40例)和常规组(应用常规液体复苏抢救方法,40例)。比较3组的抢救效果(在24 h内病死率、7 d内病死率)、电解质水平( K+ 、Na+ 、Cl- 、Mg2+浓度)、凝血功能(凝血酶原时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间)、并发症发生率、平均输液量。
〖HTH〗结果〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗3组创伤失血性休克患者24 h内病死率差异无统计学意义(P>005)。限制组、高渗盐组创伤失血性休克患者7 d内病死率、并发症发生率低于常规组,差异均有统计学意义(P<005);限制组、高渗盐组凝血酶原时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间短于常规组,输液量少于常规组,差异均有统计学意义(P<005)。复苏前后,3组电解质水平差异无统计学意义(P>005);复苏后,3组K+和Mg2+水平低于复苏前,限制组和高渗盐组Na+水平高于复苏前,差异均有统计学意义(P<005)。
〖HTH〗结论〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗限制组、高渗盐组比常规组治疗创伤失血性休克患者能够积极改善凝血功能,降低并发症发生率。

关键词: 休克, 出血性, 补液疗法, 免疫, 电解质

Abstract: [Abstract]〓Objective〖HTSS〗〓To analyze the rescue effect of different fluid resuscitation on traumatic hemorrhagic shock and its influence on immune function and electrolyte level.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Methods〖HTSS〗〓One hundred and twenty patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock were randomly divided into limited group(40 cases treated with limited fluid resuscitation), hypertonic saline group(40 cases treated with hypertonic saline resuscitation) and conventional group(40 cases treated with conventional fluid resuscitation). The rescue effect(mortality within 24 h and mortality within 7 d), electrolyte level(concentration of K+, Na+, Cl-, Mg2+), coagulation function(prothrombin time, activation time of partial thromboplastin), complication rate and average infusion volume were compared among the three groups.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Results〖HTSS〗〓There was no significant difference in 7day mortality and complication rates between the restricted group and the hypertonic saline group(P<005). Prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time in the restricted group and the hypertonic saline group were shorter than those in the conventional group, and the infusion volume was less than that in the conventional group(P<005). There was no significant difference in electrolyte levels between the three groups before and after resuscitation(P>005). After resuscitation, the levels of K+ and Mg2+ in the three groups were lower than those before resuscitation, and the Na+ levels in the restricted group and the hypertonic saline group were higher than those before resuscitation, with a statistically significant difference(P<005).
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖HTSS〗〓Limiting group and hyperosmotic salt group can actively improve coagulation function and reduce the incidence of complications compared with the conventional group in the treatment of traumatic hemorrhagic shock.

Key words: shock, hemorrhagic, fluid therapy, immunity, electrolytes