河北医科大学学报

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者胫骨结节-股骨滑车沟间距的可行性分析

  

  1. 1.冀中能源峰峰集团有限公司总医院邯郸院区骨三科,河北 邯郸 056000;2.冀中能源峰峰集团有限公司总医院邯郸院区骨五科,河北 邯郸 056000
  • 出版日期:2020-06-25 发布日期:2020-06-29
  • 作者简介:张合(1977-),男,河北唐山人,冀中能源峰峰集团有限公司总医院邯郸院区副主任医师,医学硕士,从事骨关节疾病诊治研究。

The feasibility analysis of the manual measurement of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance in the patient with patellar instability by modified single image method#br#

  1. 1.The Third Department of Orthopaedics, Handan Branch of Jizhong Engry Fengfeng Group Hospital,
    Hebei Province, Handan 056000, China; 2.The Fifth Department of Orthopaedics, Handan Branch of
    Jizhong Engry Fengfeng Group Hospital, Hebei Province, Handan 056000, China
  • Online:2020-06-25 Published:2020-06-29

摘要: 目的 探讨改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者胫骨结节-股骨滑车沟(tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove,TT-TG)间距的可行性。
方法 选取髌骨不稳患者30例。高年资手术医师A、B,使用改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距,对比高资年影像学医师C,使用双图法测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距。应用Cronbach′s alpha系数评价结果的可信度。应用组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)评价结果的可重复性。使用Bland-Altman分析图评价结果的一致性。
结果 高年资手术医师A、B使用改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距分别和高年资影像学医师C使用双图法测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距比较,Cronbach′s alpha系数分别为0.913和0.959,组内相关系数分别为0.913和0.958。Bland-Altman分析图显示,TT-TG间距差值(mm)的均值为-0.276(95%CI:-3.526~2.974)和0.143(95%CI:-3.110~3.397)。A、B医师之间使用改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距比较,Cronbach′s alpha系数为0.891,组内相关系数为0.891。Bland-Altman分析图显示TT-TG间距差值(mm)的均值为-0.276(95%CI:-3.526~2.974)。
结论 改良单图像法手工测量髌骨不稳患者TT-TG间距操作简单,可以准确测量出髌骨不稳患者的TT-TG间距,该方法和双图法可以相互替换使用。

关键词: 髌骨, 胫骨结节-股骨滑车沟间距, 核磁共振成像

Abstract: Objective To discuss the feasibility of manual measurement of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove(TT-TG) distance in the patient with patellar instability by modified single image method.
Methods Thirty cases patients with patellar instability were selected. Senior surgeons A and B measured the TT-TG distance of patients with patellar instability by modified single-image method and compared with senior radiologist C who measured the TT-TG distance of patients with patellar instability by double-image method.The Cronbach′s alpha coefficient was used to evaluate the reliability of the results.The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the repeatability of the results.The Bland-Altman analysis diagram was used to evaluate the consistency of the results.
Results Senior surgeons A and B who measured the TT-TG distance of patients with patellar instability by modified single-image method compared with senior radiologist C who measured the TT-TG distance of patients with patellar instability by double-image method: Cronbach′s alpha coefficients were 0.913 and 0.959, respectively.The intragroup correlation coefficients were 0.913 and 0.958, respectively. The Bland-Altman analysis diagrams showed that the mean of TT-TG distance D-value(mm) was -0.276(95% CI:-3.526-2.974) and 0.143 (95% CI:-3.110-3.397). Senior surgeons A and B used the modified method to measure TT-TG distance manually in patellar instability patients.The Cronbach′s alpha coefficient was 0.891. The intragroup correlation coefficient was 0.891. 〖JP2〗The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean of TT-TG distance difference(mm) was -0.276 (95% CI:〖JP〗-3.526-2.974).
Conclusion The modified single image method is simple to measure TT-TG distance manually in patients with patellar instability. It can accurately measure TT-TG distance in patients with patellar instability. This method and double image method can be used interchangeably.

Key words: patella, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, magnetic resonance imaging