河北医科大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 476-480.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2022.04.021

• • 上一篇    下一篇

瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚靶控输注维持麻醉在扁桃体切除术患儿中的应用效果

  

  1. 1.河北省眼科医院手麻科,河北 邢台 0540002.河北省邢台市妇幼保健院手麻科, 河北 邢台 054000;3.河北省邢台市人民医院麻醉科,河北 邢台 054000

  • 出版日期:2022-04-25 发布日期:2022-04-30
  • 作者简介:张立立(1990-),女,河北邢台人,河北省眼科医院住院医师,医学硕士,从事小儿临床麻醉研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学科学研究课题计划项目(20190132)

Application effect of remifentanil combined with propofol target-controlled infusion to maintain anesthesia in children undergoing tonsillectomy

  1. 1.Department of Hand Anesthesia, Hebei Eye Hospital, Hebei Province, Xingtai 054000, China;

    2.Department of Hand Anesthesia, Xingtai Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Hebei Province,

    Xingtai 054000, China; 3.Department of Anesthesiology, Xingtai Peoples Hospital, Hebei Province, Xingtai 054000, China

  • Online:2022-04-25 Published:2022-04-30

摘要:

目的  探讨瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚靶控输注维持麻醉在扁桃体切除术患儿中的应用效果。

方法  选择河北省眼科医院治疗的85例慢性扁桃体炎并行扁桃体切除术的患儿病例样本进行回顾性分析,根据术中采取的不同麻醉方案将纳入研究的病例分为普通麻醉组和靶控麻醉组,普通麻醉组患儿采用丙泊酚、芬太尼、苯磺顺阿曲库铵进行麻醉诱导,靶控麻醉组患儿采用瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚靶控输注维持麻醉方案。对比两组患儿手术结束至拔管时长、自主呼吸恢复时长、手术结束后患儿苏醒时长,对比2组麻醉诱导前(T1)、手术开始时(T2)、手术结束时(T3)和恢复自主呼吸时(T4)不同时刻心率(heart rate, HR)、平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)和血氧饱和度(blood oxygen saturationSpO2),对比2组患儿手术结束后送至麻醉恢复室时的小儿苏醒期躁动评分,对比2组患儿术后拔管5 minOAA/S分级情况,对比2组患儿苏醒期间呼吸系统并发症发生情况。

结果  靶控麻醉组患儿手术结束至拔管时长、手术结束后患儿苏醒时长以及患儿自主呼吸恢复时长均低于普通麻醉组(P0.05);2组患儿HR在组间、时点间方面比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),2组患儿MAP在组间、时点间、组间·时点间交互作用方面比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),2组患儿SpO2在时点间方面比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05);靶控麻醉组患儿PAED评分明显低于普通麻醉组(P0.05);2组患儿OAA/S评级3级及以下例数比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05);靶控麻醉组患儿苏醒期呛咳、气道痉挛发生率明显低于普通麻醉组(P0.05)。

结论  瑞芬太尼联合丙泊酚靶控输注维持麻醉有助于行扁桃体切除术的患儿血流动力学稳定,降低术后躁动发生率同时促进患儿苏醒,减少呼吸系统并发症的发生。

关键词:

扁桃体切除术, 瑞芬太尼, 丙泊酚

Abstract:

Objective  To explore the application effect of remifentanil combined with propofol target-controlled infusion(TCI) to maintain anesthesia in children undergoing tonsillectomy.

Methods  Samples of 85 children with chronic tonsillitis who were treated in Hebei Eye Hospital were selected for retrospective analysis. According to the different anesthesia plans adopted during the operation, they were divided into general anesthesia group and target-controlled anesthesia group. Children in the general anesthesia group received propofol, fentanyl, and atracurium for induction of anesthesia, and children in the target-controlled anesthesia group received remifentanil combined with propofol target-controlled infusion to maintain the anesthesia. The time interval from the end of the operation to extubation, the time to recover spontaneous breathing, and the time to wake up after the operation were compared between two groups of children. Heart rate(HR), mean arterial pressure(MAP) and blood oxygen saturation(SpO2) before anesthesia induction(T1), at the beginning of the operation(T2), at the end of the operation(T3) and at the time of recovery of spontaneous breathing(T4) were compared between two groups. The pediatric anesthesia emergence deliriumPAED agitation scores of two groups when they were sent to the anesthesia recovery room after the operation, and the OAA/S rating of the children at 5 min after the extubation, and the occurrence of respiratory complications during the recovery period of the two groups of children were compared.

Results  The duration from the end of the operation to the extubation, the recovery time after the end of operation, and the recovery time of the spontaneous breathing of the children in the target-controlled anesthesia group were lower than those in the general anesthesia group(P0.05). The differences of interaction between groups, and time points were statistically significant with respect to HR(P0.05). The differences of interaction between groups, time points and time points between groups were statistically significant with respect to MAP(P0.05). There was a statistical difference in time points between groups in terms of SpO2(P0.05). The pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium(PAED) score of children in the target-controlled anesthesia group was significantly lower than that of general anesthesia group(P0.05). There was no difference in the number of cases with OAA/S grade 3 and below between two groups(P0.05). The incidence of coughing and airway spasm in the target-controlled anesthesia group during the recovery period was significantly lower than that of general anesthesia group(P0.05).

Conclusion  Remifentanil combined with propofol target-controlled infusion to maintain anesthesia can help children undergoing tonsillectomy to stabilize hemodynamics, reduce the incidence of postoperative restlessness, promote the recovery of children, and reduce the incidence of respiratory complications.

Key words: tonsillectomy; remifentanil, propofol