前路与后路手术治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床效果#br#

doi:10.3969/j.issn.10073205.2018.06.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要： ［摘要］〓
〖HTH〗目的〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗探讨脊柱前路与后路手术治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床效果。
〖HTH〗方法〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗选取胸腰椎爆裂性骨折患者60例，根据手术方式分为前路组和后路组各30例，分别采用脊柱前路内固定器系统和后路椎弓根钉棒系统治疗。记录2组手术时间、出血量、引流量、完全融合时间，应用CT测量术前、术后1周及术后1年椎管前后径和横断面积，观察术前、术后即刻及术后1年Cobb′s角变化值，参照美国脊柱损伤协会（American Spinal Injury Association，ASIA）标准评估术后1年神经功能恢复情况。
〖HTH〗结果〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗前路组术中出血量、术后引流量多于后路组，手术时间、融合时间长于后路组（P＜005）。术后1周、1年2组椎管狭窄程度均较术前改善，前路组术后1年椎管狭窄程度恢复优于后路组，其组间、时点间、组间·时点间交互作用差异有统计学意义（P＜005）。术后2组Cobb′s角均小于术前，前路组术后1年Cobb′s角小于后路组，其组间、时点间、组间·时点间交互作用差异有统计学意义（P＜005）；前路组术后1年Cobb′s角丢失小于后路组（P＜005）。术后1年2组ASIA分级均优于术前（P＜005）。
〖HTH〗结论〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗脊柱后路椎弓根钉棒系统不足之处是术后Cobb′s角丢失较大，脊柱前路内固定器系统虽然手术时间长、创伤大，但术后椎管狭窄程度轻、Cobb′s角丢失少，2种术式各有优缺点，应根据患者具体情况选择合适的手术方式。

关键词: 脊柱骨折, 前路与后路手术, 对比研究

Abstract: ［Abstract］〓Objective〖HTSS〗〓To explore the clinical effect of the anterior and posterior surgical approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Methods〖HTSS〗〓A total of 60 patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture who were admitted in our hospital from March, 2015 to February, 2016 were included in the study and divided into the anterior group and posterior group with 30 cases in each group according to different surgical methods. The patients in the anterior group were given internal fixation, while the patients in the posterior group were given pedicle screw system treatment. The operation time, blood loss, drainage volume, and total fusion time were recorded. CT was used to measure the anteroposterior diameter and crosssectional area of spinal canal before operation, 1 week and 1 year after operation. Cobb′s angle change value before operation, immediately after operation, and 1 year after operation was observed. American Spinal Injury Association（ASIA） was used to evaluate the neurological function recovery 1 year after operation.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Results〖HTSS〗〓The intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage volume in the anterior group were significantly greater than those in the posterior group, while the operation time and fusion time were significantly longer than those in the posterior group(P＜005). The spinal canal stenosis degree 1 week and 1 year after operation in the two groups was significantly improved when compared with before operation(P＜005). The comparison of spinal canal stenosis 1 week after operation between the two groups was not statistically significant(P＞005). The recovery of spinal canal stenosis 1 year after operation in the anterior group was significantly superior to that in the posterior group(P＜005)，there was a statistically significant in the interactions between groups, time points, groups and time points. Cobb′s angle after opeation in the two groups was significantly reduced when compared with before operation(P＜005)， there was a statistically significant in the interactions between groups, time points, groups and time points. Cobb′s angle loss 1 year after operation in the anterior group was significantly superior to that in the posterior group(P＜005). ASIA grading 1 year after operation in the two groups was significantly superior to that before operation(P＜005).
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖HTSS〗〓The great Cobb′s angle loss is the disadvantage of pedicle screw system therapy, while the internal fixation has a long operation time and large trauma, but the postoperative spinal canal stenosis degree is small, and Cobb′s angle loss is less. Due to the advantages and disadvantages for the two surgical methods, the patients should select the appropriate surgical methods according to the specific circumstance.

Key words: spinal fractures； anterior and posterior surgical, comparative study

李炳南，胡桂君，郑〓海，武〓容，蔺振军，李奎蒙. 前路与后路手术治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床效果#br#[J]. 河北医科大学学报, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10073205.2018.06.013.

LI Bingnan, HU Guijun, ZHENG Hai, WU Rong, LIN Zhenjun, LI Kuimeng. Clinical study of anterior and posterior surgical treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures#br#[J]. Journal of Hebei Medical University, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10073205.2018.06.013.

[1]	张林, 陈晓钢, 季沐梵, 丁静, 刘青柏. 术前椎体压缩程度联合骨密度对胸腰椎骨折椎弓根螺钉内固定术后椎体高度再丢失的预测 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2023, 44(3): 274-278.
[2]	张沛, 杜源, 王思迪, 孙承军, 金祺. 右美托咪定静脉麻醉联合局部麻醉用于高龄胸腰椎骨折患者经皮椎体后凸成形术的麻醉效果观察[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(11): 1328-1332.
[3]	王强1,张志超2*,张慧明2,甄雪飞2,谢继平2. 唑来膦酸对老年骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者BALP和BG的影响及疗效[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2020, 41(4): 463-466.
[4]	刘子腾，吴瑞锋，杨炜琦，张雪莲，周伯良. 杂交冠状动脉血运重建术在冠心病治疗中的应用价值[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2019, 40(6): 667-670.
[5]	马亚贞1，李索林1*，薛文勇2，齐进春2，王文博1，杜〓蕾2. 2种腹腔镜睾丸固定术治疗小儿隐睾效果对比观察#br#[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2019, 40(4): 451-455.
[6]	李晓华1，刘永强1*，范金鹏2，田晓晨1，赵玉顺3. PVP/PKP术后继发邻近椎体压缩骨折危险因素的研究分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2019, 40(11): 1275-1278,1284.
[7]	薛建昌1，吴海峰1，郑浩2*，张建武1，张金艳3，王国英4. 3种结核分枝杆菌耐药检测方法的对比研究#br#[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2019, 40(11): 1312-1316.
[8]	吴〓菲，陈惠兰，王伟伟，冯向春. 151例足月与早产新生儿化脓性脑膜炎的对比分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2018, 38(7): 837-840.
[9]	王〓力1，王天轶2，温晓华1*，刘艳如1，胡兴茂3，高〓冕1. 高血压慢病患者的慢病团队管理效果研究#br#[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2018, 38(6): 645-648,652.
[10]	刘建宁1，王〓伟2，贾〓蓓2*. 重组人酸性成纤维细胞生长因子治疗开放伤的随机临床研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2018, 38(6): 714-716.
[11]	张纪威1，闫茗诺怡2，尹〓豫1，钱宇航1，王义兵1，步建立1*. 经椎间隙球囊椎体复位cage植骨治疗陈旧性胸腰椎后凸畸形的临床研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2018, 38(4): 458-461.
[12]	马树伟，吴继功*，马华松，高〓博. PKP治疗急性期及亚急性期椎体压缩骨折的效果分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2018, 38(3): 280-283.
[13]	时卉丽，李玉秋，程〓菲，李建民，何路军. 国产与进口血细胞处理机制备冰冻解冻去甘油红细胞的质量对比[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2017, 37(11): 1344-1347.
[14]	孙玉萍1，李昊儒2. 医院结合家庭康复治疗对脑瘫患儿粗大运动功能的影响[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2017, 37(10): 1216-1218.
[15]	张剑英1，付少峰2. 雷替曲塞联合顺铂新辅助化疗对食管癌手术患者的疗效评价[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37(8): 960-962.

前路与后路手术治疗胸腰椎爆裂性骨折的临床效果#br#

Clinical study of anterior and posterior surgical treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures#br#

HTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价