›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 381-381.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

中心静脉压与全心舒张末容积指数预测机械通气的感染性休克患者液体反应性准确性的比较

韩玉;沈洪丽;苗晓云;回志;吴忠荣;张晓卫   

  1. 河北省沧州市中心医院重症医学科,河北 沧州,061001
  • 发布日期:2015-04-25

YOU Yang;FENG Qian;XIA Yue;QI Guo-qing;ZHANG Yan;ZHANG Qing-wen

HAN Yu;SHEN Hong-li;MIAO Xiao-yun;HUI Zhi;WU Zhong-rong;ZHANG Xiao-wei   

  • Published:2015-04-25

摘要: 目的:比较中心静脉压(central venous pressure,CVP)与全心舒张末容积指数(global end diastolic volume index,GEDVI)预测机械通气的感染性休克患者液体反应性的准确性。方法55例机械通气的感染性休克患者进行55次液体负荷试验,经静脉以6 mL/kg 30 min输注6%羟乙基淀粉200/0.5,经右颈内静脉或锁骨下静脉监测 CVP,采用脉搏指示连续心输出量(pulse-induced contour cardiac output,PiCCO)监测液体负荷前后心脏指数(cardiac index,CI)、GEDVI,将 CI 增加值(△CI)≥15%定义为液体反应阳性。观察液体负荷试验前后血流动力学的变化,评价 CVP、GEDVI 与△CI 的相关性。结果容量治疗有反应者治疗后 CVP 变化率高于容量治疗无反应者,但差异无统计学意义(P >0.05);容量治疗有反应者治疗后 GEDVI 变化率高于容量治疗无反应者,差异有统计学意义(P <0.01)。容量治疗后 CVP 及 GEDVI 与治疗前之差为增量,发现△CVP 与△CI 无明显相关性,而△GEDVI 与△CI 呈正相关(r =0.816,P <0.01)。结论与 CVP 相比,GEDVI 能够更好地反映感染性休克患者心脏前负荷,能够预测液体反应性。

关键词: 休克, 呼吸, 人工, 中心静脉压, 心排血量

Abstract: Objective To assess fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock by central venous pressure(CVP)and global end diastolic volume index(GEDVI). Methods Fifty-five mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock underwent 55 liquid load tests(LLT),within 30 minutes,the subjects received an intravenous infusion of 6 ml/kg of 6%hydroxyethyl starch(200/0.5).The CVP was monitored through a catheter introduced via the right internal jugular vein and the subclavian vein.The cardiac index(CI)and GEDVI before and after fluid loading were monitored by pulse-induced contour cardiac output(PiCCO).Positive fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in CI(△CI)by 15% or more.Hemodynamic changes before and after LLT were observed and the correlations between CVP,GEDVI and △CI were assessed.Results The change rate of CVP after volume treatment of responders was higher than that of non-responders,but there was no significant difference (P > 0.05 ).The change rate of GEDVI after volume treatment of responders was higher than that of non-responders,there was significant difference(P <0.01).CVP and GEDVI before the resuscitation showed increase after the resuscitation.There was no significant correlation between △CVP and △CI,while there was positive correlation between △GEDVI and △CI(r =0.816,P <0.01).Conclusion Compared with CVP,GEDVI can better reflect cardiac preload in septic shock patients,and predict fluid responsiveness.

Key words: shock, respiration, artificial, central venous pressure, cardiac output

中图分类号: