河北医科大学学报

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

全髋双动置换术与PFNA在治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效比较

  

  1. 西藏自治区人民政府驻成都办事处医院骨科,四川 成都 610041
  • 出版日期:2020-05-25 发布日期:2020-06-04
  • 作者简介:刘代忠(1982-),男,四川内江人,西藏自治区人民政府驻成都办事处医院主治医师,医学学士,从事骨科疾病诊治研究。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省医学科研青年创新课题(Q17078)

Comparison on clinical curative effect of dual mobility total hip replacement and PFNA on intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly#br#

  1. Department of  Orthopaedics, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People′s Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Online:2020-05-25 Published:2020-06-04

摘要: [摘要]
目的  探究全髋双动置换术与股骨近端髓内钉内固定(proximal femoral nail anti-rotation,PFNA)治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。
方法  选择77例高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者作为研究对象,32例患者行全髋双动置换术,纳入全髋双动置换术组,45例患者行PFNA手术治疗,纳入PFNA组。比较2组患者围手术期指标、疼痛评分、术后髋关节功能及并发症发生情况。
结果  全髋双动置换术组手术时间、下地负重时间及住院时间短于PFNA组,术中出血量高于PFNA组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者术后2周时疼痛评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),全髋双动置换术组患者术后3、6个月时疼痛评分显著低于PFNA组(P<0.05);末次随访时全髋双动置换术组患者Harris评分优于PFNA组(P<0.05);全髋双动置换术组、PFNA组髋关节功能恢复Harris评分等级比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
结论   全髋双动置换术治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折效果较好,与PFNA术比较,可缩短术后恢复时间,提高髋关节功能。

关键词: 关节成形术, 置换, 髋, 股骨骨折, 内固定器

Abstract: [Abstract] Objective〖HTSS〗To explore clinical curative effect of dual mobility total hip replacement(DMTHR) and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) on intertrochanteric fractures(IF) in the elderly.
〖WTHZ〗Methods〖HTSS〗Seventy-seven elderly IF patients who were admitted to the hospital were enrolled. Thirty-two patients underwent DMTHR(DMTHR group), while the other 45 patients underwent PFNA(PFNA group). Perioperative indexes, pain scores, postoperative hip function and occurrence of complications were compared between two groups.
〖WTHZ〗Results〖HTSS〗The operation time, weight-bearing time on the ground and hospitalization time in DMTHAPR group were shorter than those in PFNA group, while intraoperative blood loss was more than that in PFNA group(P<0.05). At 2 weeks after surgery, there was no significant difference in pain scores between two groups (P>0.05). At 3 and 6 months after surgery, pain scores in DMTHAPR group were significantly lower than those in PFNA group(P<0.05). At the last follow-up, Harris score of DMTHAPR group was better than that of PFNA group(P<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the Harris score between the total hip double-action replacement group and the PENA group(P<0.05).
〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖HTSS〗The curative effect of DMTHAPR is relatively better on IF in the elderly. Compared with PFNA, it can shorten postoperative recovery time, and improve hip function.

Key words: arthroplasty, replacement, hip, femoral fractures; Internal Fixators