河北医科大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 273-277.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2021.03.005

• • 上一篇    下一篇

心脏瓣膜病合并心房颤动患者新型治疗方式的临床研究

  

  1. 河北省保定市第一中心医院心脏血管外科,河北 保定 071000
  • 出版日期:2021-03-25 发布日期:2021-04-01
  • 作者简介:梁慧青(1984-),女,河北保定人,河北省保定市第一中心医院主治医师,医学硕士,从事心脏血管外科疾病诊治研究。

Clinical study of new treatment approaches for patients with valvular heart disease complicated by atrial fibrillation

  1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, the First Central Hospital of Baoding, Hebei Province, Baoding 071000, China
  • Online:2021-03-25 Published:2021-04-01

摘要: 目的  针对瓣膜病所致的心房颤动(atrial fabrillation,AF),通过对杂交手术、单纯外科手术、单纯内科射频消融3种方法治疗效果的对比研究,评价杂交手术在治疗AF方面的临床价值。
方法  选取就诊于保定市第一中心医院心外科的瓣膜病合并AF患者79例,所有患者均行瓣膜置换手术,根据针对AF的治疗方法分为杂交手术组、单纯迷宫手术组及单纯介入消融组。杂交手术组及单纯迷宫手术组在行瓣膜置换手术同时行直视下迷宫手术,杂交手术组及单纯介入消融组患者在术后三个月时至内科行介入射频消融治疗,术后随访1年,分别于瓣膜置换术后3、6、9、15个月(即杂交手术组及单纯介入消融组介入术后1、3、6、12月)复查心电图及超声心动图,比较两组术后恢复情况。
结果  杂交手术组内科介入手术时间短于单纯介入消融组(P<0.05)。杂交手术组9个月及15个月AF治愈率高于单纯迷宫手术组和单纯介入消融组,单纯迷宫手术组9 个月及15个月AF治愈率高于单纯介入消融组(P<0.05)。所有患者每次复查超声心动图,并记录EF值,3组时点间、组间·时点间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
结论  杂交手术治疗AF有较高的治愈率,具有较高的临床应用价值。

关键词: 房颤, 杂交手术, 射频消融, 迷宫手术

Abstract: Objective  To evaluate the clinical value of hybrid surgery in the treatment of atrial fibrillation(AF) by comparing the therapeutic effects of three methods: hybrid surgery, surgery alone and radiofrequency ablation(RFA) alone.
Methods  Seventy-nine patients with valvular disease complicated by AF who were admitted to department of cardiovascular surgery, the first central hospital of Baoding were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent valve replacement. According to the treatment methods for AF, they were divided into hybrid surgery group, Cox-Maze procedure alone group(Maze group) and interventional ablation alone group. Hybrid surgery group and Maze group were treated with valve replacement and maze procedure under direct vision. Hybrid surgery group and interventional ablation alone group were treated in Department of Internal Medicine with interventional RFA at 3 months after operation. The patients were followed up for 1 year. ECG and echocardiography were reexamined at 3, 6, 9 and 15 months after valve replacement(at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after intervention in hybrid surgery group and interventional ablation alone group). The recovery of the two groups was compared.
Results  The duration of medical intervention was shorter in hybrid surgery group than in interventional ablation alone group(P<0.05). The cure rate of AF at 9 and 15 months was higher in hybrid surgery group than in Maze group and interventional ablation alone group, and the cure rate of AF at 9 and 15 months was higher in Maze group than in interventional ablation alone group(P<0.05). All patients were reexamined by echocardiography and EF values were recorded. The differences in time points and time points between any two groups were statistically significant in the three groups(P<0.05).
Conclusion  In the treatment of AF, hybrid surgery has a higher cure rate and a higher application value in clinical practice.

Key words: atrial fibrillation, hybrid surgery, radiofrequency ablation, maze surgery