FSH/LH在AMH正常人群中评估卵巢低反应的价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2021.09.013

河北医科大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9): 1057-1062.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2021.09.013

FSH/LH在AMH正常人群中评估卵巢低反应的价值

河北医科大学第二医院生殖医学科，河北石家庄 050000

出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-09-28
作者简介:王紫微(1993-)，女，河北石家庄人，河北医科大学第二医院医学硕士研究生，从事生殖内分泌学研究。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2018YFC1002104）；河北省民生科技专项（20377714D）；京津冀合作专项（H2019206707）

The value of FSH/LH in assessing poor ovarian response in normal AMH population

Reproductive Medicine Center, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China

Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-09-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究在抗苗勒管激素（anti-müllerian hormone,AMH）正常人群中，促卵泡激素与黄体生成素比值（follicle-stimulating hormone/luteinizing hormone,FSH/LH）升高是否与卵巢低反应的发生相关，以期找到诊断临界值。
方法分析我院生殖中心进行体外受精-胚胎移植（in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer,IVF-ET）助孕的周期4 363个，通过平滑曲线拟合分析在1.1＜AMH＜6 μg/L人群中FSH/LH与卵巢低反应发生的关系，寻找阈值或饱和点，根据找到的阈值或饱和点分组，比较两组人群特征、周期信息、周期结局，分析FSH/LH升高与卵巢低反应及周期结局的变化。
结果在AMH正常人群中，通过平滑曲线拟合发现，随FSH/LH水平增加，卵巢低反应发生增加，但通过阈值与饱和分析找出最佳饱和点为3.3。通过FSH/LH≥3.3组与FSH/LH＜3.3组比较，年龄、体重指数、FSH、促性腺激素（gonadotropins,Gn）启动剂量、Gn总剂量均显著升高；AMH、窦卵泡数（antral follicle counting，AFC）、基础LH、雌激素（estrogen,E2）、获卵总数、可移植胚胎率、扳机日E2、孕激素（progesterone,P）水平均降低（P＜0.05）。
结论在控制性超促排卵过程中，AMH是预测卵巢反应性的可靠指标。在AMH正常人群中，随FSH/LH升高卵巢低反应的发生率增加，FSH/LH=3.3为饱和值，但预测卵巢低反应发生的准确率仅有23%， FSH/LH升高的人群中，FSH升高及LH降低都与卵巢低反应发生相关。FSH/LH升高使最终获卵率及可移植胚胎率降低，但不影响优质胚胎率及最终的妊娠率。

关键词: 胚胎移植, 体外受精, 卵巢低反应

Abstract: Objective To study whether the increase of follicle-stimulating hormone/luteinizing hormone(FSH/LH) in the population with normal anti-müllerian hormone(AMH) is related to the occurrence of poor ovarian response(POR), in order to determine the diagnostic threshold.
Methods A total of 4 363 cycles of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer(IVF-ET) at the reproductive center of our hospital were analyzed. The relationship between FSH/LH and POR in the population with 1.1＜AMH＜6 μg/L was analyzed through the method of smooth curve fitting, to find the threshold or saturation point, based on which the population was grouped. The population characteristics, cycle information, and cycle outcome of the two groups were compared, and an increase in FSH/LH, and changes in POR and cycle outcome were analyzed.
Results In the population with normal AMH, smooth cure fitting found that with the increase of FSH/LH level, the incidence of POR was increased, and the optimal saturation point was 3.3 by threshold and saturation analysis. By comparing FSH/LH＞3.3 group with FSH/LH＜3.3 group, age, body mass index(BMI), FSH, the starting dose of gonadotropins(Gn) and the total dose of Gn were significantly increased, whereas AMH, AFC, basal LH, E2, the total number of eggs obtained, the rate of transferable embryos, the E2 and P levels on the trigger day were all decreased(P＜0.05).
Conclusion In the process of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation(COH), AMH is a reliable indicator to predict ovarian responsiveness. In the population with normal AMH, the incidence of POR increases with the increase of FSH/LH. FSH/LH:3.3 is a saturation value, but the accuracy of predicting the occurrence of POR is only 23%. In the population with elevated FSH/LH, both the increase of FSH and the decrease of LH are related to the occurrence of POR. The increase of FSH/LH reduces the final number of eggs obtained and the rate of transferable embryos, but does not affect the rate of high-quality embryos and the final pregnancy rate.

Key words: embryo transfer, fertilization in vitro, poor ovarian response

王紫微, 范艳丽, 辛欣, 许欣, 赵畔, 郝桂敏. FSH/LH在AMH正常人群中评估卵巢低反应的价值[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(9): 1057-1062.

WANG Zi-wei, FAN Yan-li, XIN Xin, XU Xin, ZHAO Pan, HAO Gui-min. The value of FSH/LH in assessing poor ovarian response in normal AMH population[J]. Journal of Hebei Medical University, 2021, 42(9): 1057-1062.

[1]	吴海峰, 贾建雷, 李倩, 甄秀丽, 魏雅楠, 乜照燕. 白藜芦醇通过调节SIRT1改善环磷酰胺诱导的人颗粒细胞氧化应激损伤 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2022, 43(7): 832-838.
[2]	卜晓萌, 牟天伊, 崔乐乐, 刘艳君, 贾婵维, 马延敏. 不同卵巢反应预测指标对不孕女性卵巢反应功能的评价效果比较 [J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2022, 43(7): 801-805.
[3]	李澎涛, 殷晨星, 王娜, 邢鹏, 孟娜娜, 郭战坤. 不同发育阶段、不同质量囊胚冷冻复苏移植周期妊娠结局分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2022, 43(2): 166-172.
[4]	朱序理, 赵志明, 曹金凤, 杜元杰, 周亮, 王跃. 胚源性IL-1β与人类胚胎发育及种植的关系[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2020, 41(11): 1291-1295.
[5]	王丽娜1，田〓瑛2（综述），赵〓剑2，王〓海2*（审校）. 囊胚移植在辅助生殖技术临床实践中的优势和存在问题[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2019, 40(8): 988-992.
[6]	曹明雅1，赵志明1*，阎〓雪2，郝桂敏1，曹金凤1，崔〓娜1. 常规体外受精中受精障碍相关因素的回顾性分析[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2019, 40(3): 309-314.
[7]	李小玉，贾蕊，曹明雅,周亮,朱序理,赵志明*. 体外受精-胚胎移植中生长激素在子宫内膜异位症患者中的作用[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2019, 40(11): 1290-1294.
[8]	赵振钏，亓蓉，梁莹，王娟，高星. 生长激素在高龄卵巢储备功能减退者微刺激方案中的应用[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2019, 40(10): 1172-1176.
[9]	杨丛品，王丽丽，李爱民. 不孕妇女心理应激状态对IVFET妊娠结局的影响#br#[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2018, 38(7): 806-809.
[10]	刘〓灿，汪〓辉，李〓怡，张〓坪，江〓乾，甄秀丽*. 颗粒细胞骨形态发生蛋白9评估IVF卵母细胞成熟及胚胎发育[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2018, 38(4): 425-430.
[11]	王〓娜，李澎涛，邢〓鹏，殷晨星. 短时受精失败或低受精率周期不同受精来源卵母细胞发育潜能比较[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2017, 37(12): 1464-1467.
[12]	李铭婷1，阎〓雪2，曹明雅3，赵志明3*. 未行手术治疗的卵巢子宫内膜异位囊肿对体外受精-胚胎移植结局的影响[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2017, 37(1): 33-37.
[13]	杨丛品，杨〓静，李美霞，赵志明，李爱民*. 体外受精-胚胎移植患者的心理现状与妊娠结局[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37(11): 1282-1284,1288.
[14]	赵志明;崔娜;郝桂敏;徐素欣. 人卵巢黄素化颗粒细胞端粒酶活性与卵巢反应性及胚胎质量的关系[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 621-621.
[15]	高海杰;徐素欣;吴芹;邱娜璇. 多指标预测卵巢储备功能在体外受精-胚胎移植中的临床研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 1281-1281.

FSH/LH在AMH正常人群中评估卵巢低反应的价值

The value of FSH/LH in assessing poor ovarian response in normal AMH population

HTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价