河北医科大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 1188-1193.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2024.10.010

• • 上一篇    下一篇

改良十字缝合法在直肠癌回肠造口还纳中的应用

  

  1. 1.河北省人民医院胃肠外科,河北 石家庄 050051;2.河北省人民医院妇科,河北 石家庄 050051;3.河北省人民医院肿瘤内科,河北 石家庄 050051

  • 出版日期:2024-10-25 发布日期:2024-10-15
  • 作者简介:张立晓(1986-),男,河北邢台人,河北省人民医院治医师,医学硕士,从事胃肠外科疾病诊治研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20220813)

Application of the modified cross-suture technique in ileostomy reversal after rectal cancer surgery

  1. 1.Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China; 
    2.Department of Gynecology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China; 
    3.Department of Oncology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China

  • Online:2024-10-25 Published:2024-10-15

摘要: 目的 探究改良十字缝合技术在直肠癌患者进行回肠造口还纳中对腹壁切口的处理效果。
方法 回顾性分析直肠癌术后回肠造口还纳术患者150例的临床资料。根据腹壁切口处理的不同,分为对照组和观察组,每组75例。对照组采用传统一期缝合法,观察组采用改良十字缝合法。2组术后均采用倒梯形纱布加压包扎。比较2组手术时间、出血量、下床时间、排气时间、愈合时间、感染率、感染后愈合时间、住院时间、疼痛评分和满意度等。
结果 2组吻合方式、手术时间、术中出血量、一期愈合时间均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术后下床时间[(1.60±0.75) d vs. (1.96±0.62) d]、排气时间[(2.41±1.08) d vs. (2.88±0.80) d]、进食时间[(2.60±1.22) d vs. (3.07±0.92) d]、切口感染后愈合时间[(16.71±1.60) d vs. (20.38±3.59) d]、住院时间[(7.32±1.88) d vs. (8.43±2.59) d]短于对照组,早期疼痛评分[24 h:(2.75±0.64)分vs. (3.12±0.70)分;72 h:(1.09±0.29)分vs. (1.29±0.49)分]、切口感染率[9.33% vs. 21.33%]、医疗费用[(31 506.89±4 147.59)元vs. (33 854.80±7 506.47)元]低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组整体满意度评分[29.0(2.0)分vs. 28.0(8.0)分]高于对照组(P<0.05)。
结论 改良十字缝合法是直肠癌术后临时回肠造口还纳术中腹壁切口处理的有效方法,能显著降低切口感染率和术后疼痛,缩短术后恢复时间、住院时间和切口感染后愈合时间,促进患者术后恢复,降低住院费用,并提高患者满意度。


关键词: 直肠肿瘤, 缝合技术, 回肠造口术

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of the modified cross-suture technique on abdominal wall incision during ileostomy reversal in patients with rectal cancer. 
Methods Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 150 patients who underwent ileostomy reversal following rectal cancer surgery. Based on the treatment method of abdominal wall incision, the patients were divided into the control group and the observation group, with 75 patients in each group. The control group received the conventional one-stage suture method, while the observation group received the modified cross-suture technique. Both groups were given compression dressing with inverted trapezoidal-shaped gauze after surgery. The duration of operation, blood loss, time of off-bed activity, exhaust time, healing time, infection rate, healing time after infection, length of hospital stay, pain score and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. 
Results There was no significant difference in anastomosis methods, duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, and primary healing time between the two groups (P>0.05). In the observation group, the time of postoperative off-bed activity [(1.60±0.75) d vs. (1.96±0.62) d], exhaust time [(2.41±1.08) d vs. (2.88±0.80) d], time of food intake[(2.60±1.22) d vs. (3.07±0.92) d], healing time after incision infection [(16.71±1.60) d vs. (20.38±3.59) d], and length of hospital stay [(7.32±1.88) d vs. (8.43±2.59) d] were shorter than those in the control group; The early pain scores [24 h: (2.75±0.64) points vs. (3.12±0.70) points; 72 h: (1.09±0.29) points vs. (1.29±0.49) points], incision infection rate [9.33% vs. 21.33%], and medical expenses [(31 506.89±4 147.59) yuan vs. (33 854.80±7 506.47) yuan] were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The overall satisfaction score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group [29.0 (2.0) points vs. 28.0 (8.0) points] (P<0.05). 
Conclusion The modified cross-suture technique is an effective method for handing abdominal wall incisions during temporary ileostomy reversal after rectal cancer surgery. It can significantly reduce the incision infection rate and postoperative pain, shorten the postoperative recovery time, length of hospital stay and healing time after incision infection, promote postoperative recovery of patients, reduce hospitalization expenses, and improve patient satisfaction.

Key words: rectal neoplasms, suture techniques, ileostomy