河北医科大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 183-186,197.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2022.02.012

• • 上一篇    下一篇

玻璃体腔注射阿柏西普联合全视网膜光凝治疗糖尿病视网膜病变增殖期黄斑水肿的疗效分析

  

  1. 广东省深圳市南山区蛇口人民医院眼科,广东 深圳 518067
  • 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-03-03
  • 作者简介:李爽(1981-),女,河南唐河人,广东省深圳市南山区蛇口人民医院主治医师,医学硕士,从事眼科疾病诊治研究。
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市南山区技术研发和创意设计项目分项资金教育(卫生)科技资助项目(南科研卫2018041号)

Efficacy of intravitreal injection of aflibercept combined with pan-retinal photocoagulation in the treatment of diabetic macular edema induced by proliferative diabetic retinopathy

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Shekou People′s Hospital of Nanshan District, Guangdong Province,Shenzhen 518067, China
  • Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-03-03

摘要: 目的 研究玻璃体腔注射阿柏西普联合全视网膜光凝术(pan-retinal photocoagulation,PRP)治疗增殖期糖尿病视网膜病变(proliferative diabetic retinopathy,PDR)所致糖尿病性黄斑水肿(diabetic macular edema,DME)的效果。
方法 纳入具有DME的PDR患者60例(60眼),随机分为对照组和试验组,前者接受单纯PRP治疗,后者接受玻璃体腔注射阿柏西普联合PRP治疗。治疗1个月后,比较2组最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acuity,BCVA)、中央黄斑厚度(entral macular thickness,CMT)、眼内压和并发症发生率。
结果 治疗前,2组BCVA、眼内压和CMT比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,试验组BCVA优于对照组,眼内压、CMT低于对照组(P<0.05)。与治疗前相比,2组BCVA均提高,CMT均降低,对照组的眼内压较治疗前有所升高(P<0.05)。试验组的新生血管和无灌注区消退率均优于对照组,试验组的并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。
结论 阿柏西普联合PRP相比于单纯PRP治疗DR增殖期的DME,能够更有效地消退黄斑水肿,更好地提升视力,并能减少并发症的发生率,因此这种联合治疗是一种值得推广的治疗方法。


关键词: 糖尿病视网膜病变 , 阿柏西普, 全视网膜光凝术

Abstract: Objective To study the effect of intravitreal injection of aflibercept combined with pan-retinal photocoagulation(PRP) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema(DME) induced by proliferative diabetic retinopathy(PDR). 
Methods Sixty patients(60 eyes) with PDR and DME were randomly divided into control group and experimental group. The former was treated with PRP alone, and the latter was treated with intravitreal injection of arbasip combined with PRP. At one month after treatment, the best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), central macular thickness(CMT), intraocular pressure and the incidence of complications were compared between  two groups. 
Results Before treatment, there was no significant difference in BCVA, intraocular pressure and CMT between two groups(P>0.05). After treatment, BCVA in the experimental group was better than that in the control group, while intraocular pressure and CMT were lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). Compared with those before treatment, BCVA increased while CMT decreased in both groups, and intraocular pressure increased in the control group(P<0.05). The regression rates of neovascularization and non-perfusion area in the experimental group were better than those in the control group, and the incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group(P<0.05). 
Conclusion Compared with PRP alone in the treatment of DME in the proliferative stage of DR, aflibercept combined with PRP can more effectively eliminate macular edema, better improve vision, and reduce the incidence of complications. Therefore, this combined treatment is a treatment method worthy of popularization.


Key words: diabetic retinopathy, aflibercept,  , pan-retinal photocoagulation