放散状与聚焦状冲击波治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的效果比较

doi:10.3969/j.issn.10073205.2019.06.016

河北医科大学学报

放散状与聚焦状冲击波治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的效果比较

1.河北医科大学第二医院口腔修复科，河北石家庄 050000；2. 河北医科大学第二医院康复医学一科，河北石家庄050000

出版日期:2019-06-25 发布日期:2019-06-19
作者简介:王璞(1981-)，女，山东日照人，河北医科大学第二医院主治医师，医学硕士，从事口腔修复研究。

Comparison of radial and focused extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders

1.Department of Prosthodontics, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
050000, China； 2.The First Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Second Hospital of
Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China

Online:2019-06-25 Published:2019-06-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： ［摘要］〓
〖HTH〗目的〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗比较放散状与聚焦状冲击波治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的临床效果。
〖HTH〗方法〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗选取颞下颌关节紊乱病（temporomandibular joint disorders，TMD）Ⅰ类患者60例，年龄18~60周岁，采用区组随机法分为对照组、聚焦组和放散组。对照组给予常规物理疗法（超短波+手法治疗），聚焦组给予聚焦状冲击波治疗及常规物理疗法，放散组给予放散状冲击波治疗及常规物理疗法。记录所有患者治疗前、治疗结束时及治疗后3个月时的Fricton颞下颌关节紊乱指数(Fricton′s craniomandibular index，CMI)及视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale，VAS)评分，记录治疗过程中患者的不良反应发生情况。
〖HTH〗结果〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗放散组功能障碍指数(dysfunction index，DI)、CMI和VAS评分从治疗前至治疗后3个月有较大幅度降低，其组间、时点间及组间·时点间交互作用差异均有统计学意义（P＜005）；放散组PI从治疗前至治疗后3个月降低明显，其时点间差异有统计学意义（P＜005），而组间及组间·时点间交互作用差异均无统计学意义（P＞005）。3组不良反应率差异无统计学意义（P＞005）。
〖HTH〗结论〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗在治疗TMDⅠ类方面，相对于聚焦状冲击波，放散状冲击波能够早期改善关节功能和缓解疼痛，并具有良好的安全性。

关键词: 颞下颌关节紊乱病, 疼痛, 体外冲击波

Abstract: ［Abstract］ Objective〖HTSS〗〓To compare the effect of radial and focused extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Methods〖HTSS〗〓Sixty patients, aged from 18 to 60 years, who were diagnosed with temporomandibular joint disorders(TMD) Ⅰ were selected. By random block method, the patients were divided into control group, radial extracorporeal shock wave treatment(REWST) group and focused extracorporeal shock wave treatment(FEWST) group. Control group accepted physiotherapy（ultra shortwave and soft tissue massage）， RESWT group accepted physiotherapy and radial extracorporeal shock wave treatment, FEWST group accepted physiotherapy and focus extracorporeal shock wave treatment. Fricton′s craniomandibular index(CMI) was used to evaluate temporomandibular joint function. All subjects′ pain levels with Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) scores were evaluated. During the treatment, the occurrence of adverse reactions was recorded.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Results〖HTSS〗〓Dysfunction index(DI), CMI and VAS scores in the FEWST group decreased significantly from pretreatment to 3 months after treatment. There were significant differences in DI, CMI and VAS scores among three groups among groups, time points and interactions between groups(P＜005). PI in the FEWST group decreased significantly from pretreatment to 3 months after treatment. There was significant difference between the three groups at different time points(P＜005), but there was no significant difference in the interaction between groups and between groups and time points(P＞005). There were no significant difference in adverse reaction rates among the three groups(P＞005).
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖HTSS〗〓In the treatment of TMDⅠ, RESWT can improve joint function and relieve pain in the early stage and has good safety.

Key words: temporomandibular joint disorders, pain, extracorporeal shock wave

王〓璞1，倪广晓2，韩晓勇2，周宏斌2，孙伟力2，廉云敏1*. 放散状与聚焦状冲击波治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的效果比较[J]. 河北医科大学学报, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10073205.2019.06.016.

WANG Pu1, NI Guangxiao2, HAN Xiaoyong2, ZHOU Hongbin2, SUN Weili2, LIAN Yunmin1*.

Comparison of radial and focused extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders

[J]. Journal of Hebei Medical University, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.10073205.2019.06.016.

[1]	祖宝利, 石胜驰. 超声引导行DSN阻滞对单侧肩胛间区疼痛患者疗效的有效性及安全性研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2022, 43(8): 945-949.
[2]	屈媛媛, 邹鲁, 潘小燕, 许旭东, 刘鹤. 超声引导下腹横筋膜阻滞对单侧腹股沟疝修补术老年患者术后疼痛及认知功能的影响[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2022, 43(1): 95-99.
[3]	张明敏, 罗方毅, 庞波. 病房行神经阻滞加术后PCIA对老年骨科患者围手术期疼痛程度及疼痛介质、应激状态的影响研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(9): 1089-1093.
[4]	朱伟伟, 陈伟, 周敬杰, 张明, 卢新宇, 李秀艳. 电磁式体外冲击波治疗肩袖退行性变关节镜修补术后肩关节功能障碍的随机对照临床研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(4): 390-394.
[5]	欧阳俊琳（综述）, 朱小虎（审校）. 基于神经连接蛋白Neuroligins的研究及应用前景[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2021, 42(2): 246-248,封三.
[6]	于锌1，时莉芳2，范静3. 分娩镇痛对产程及母婴转归影响的回顾性临床研究#br#[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2020, 41(6): 731-734.
[7]	吴志伟1,2,宋朋飞1,2(综述),朱清广2,房〓敏2,3*(审校). 神经病理性疼痛机制研究进展[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2018, 38(9): 1095-1100.
[8]	徐〓磊（综述），徐卫国*（审校）. 乳房切除术后疼痛综合征的研究进展#br#[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2017, 37(11): 1356-1360.
[9]	姚知,张媛,王艳娟,张婷,刘菲,杨玉凤 *. 热敷与冰敷对缓解静脉补钾疼痛的效果观察[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37(6): 710-712.
[10]	李繁. 不同剂量氯胺酮对罗库溴铵静脉注射痛反应及心血管反应的影响[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37(5): 571-574.
[11]	杜玉敏 1,任玉娥 1*,丛海静 1,景凤敏 2,郗露露 1. 疼痛管理对带状疱疹后神经痛患者治疗效果的影响[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37(3): 293-295,300.
[12]	张荣. 罗哌卡因复合舒芬太尼在分娩镇痛中的应用[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37(3): 337-339.
[13]	熊明顺1，刘小平2，孟玉杰1，赵秀娟2，陈长香3. 生活方式及营养状况对老年骨质疏松患者疼痛的影响[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37(11): 1260-1263.
[14]	张凯;张为;徐佳欣;张鑫;王海旭;高磊. 腰神经后内侧支阻滞对减轻椎间孔镜下TESSYS技术髓核摘除术中疼痛的作用[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 1014-1014.
[15]	张凡;李毅;丁杰;张海林. 地塞米松对大鼠 Walker 256乳腺癌骨转移癌痛的作用[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 249-249.

放散状与聚焦状冲击波治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病的效果比较

Comparison of radial and focused extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders

HTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价