河北医科大学学报

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

降钙素原、C反应蛋白鉴别肺癌患者肿瘤热与感染性发热的价值

  

  1. 1.河北医科大学第三医院呼吸内科,河北 石家庄 050051;2.河北医科大学第二医院麻醉科,河北 石家庄 050000
  • 出版日期:2018-05-25 发布日期:2018-05-16
  • 作者简介:赵志芳(1981-),女,河北正定人,河北医科大学第三医院主治医师,医学博士,从事呼吸系统疾病诊治研究。

The role of PCT and CRP for discrimination between tumor fever and infectious fever in lung cancer patients

  1. 1.Department of Respiration, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang
    050051, China; 2.Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Hospital of Hebei
    Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Online:2018-05-25 Published:2018-05-16

摘要: [摘要]〓
〖HTH〗目的〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗探讨降钙素原(procalcitonin,PCT)、C反应蛋白(Creactive protein,CRP)鉴别非小细胞肺癌患者肿瘤热与感染性发热的临床价值。
〖HTH〗方法〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗回顾性分析住院的非小细胞肺癌患者(中性粒细胞正常)96例,将患者分为3组:血源性感染组21例,局部感染组49例,肿瘤热组26例。对各组PCT和CRP测定值进行统计分析。
〖HTH〗结果〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗血源性感染组、局部感染组PCT、PCT/CRP较肿瘤热组明显升高,血源性感染组CRP较肿瘤热组明显升高,局部感染组与肿瘤热组CRP差异无统计学意义。通过曲线下面积得出PCT/CRP为最佳判断指标。在鉴别肿瘤热与局部感染时,PCT/CRP的截断值为0.005 5,其敏感度为81.6%,特异度为96.2%;在鉴别肿瘤热与血源性感染时,PCT/CRP的截断值为0.005 0,其敏感度为90.5%,特异度为92.3%。
〖HTH〗结论〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗在诊断感染方面,PCT/CRP、PCT优于CRP,其中PCT/CRP是鉴别肿瘤热与感染性发热较好的指标。

关键词: 肺肿瘤, 发热, 降钙素原, C反应蛋白质

Abstract: [Abstract] Objective〖HTSS〗〓To explore the clinical value of procalcitonin(PCT) and Creactive protein(CRP) for discrimination between tumor fever and infectious fever in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Methods〖HTSS〗〓In our study, we retrospectively analyzed the levels of PCT and CRP in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer and fever to the hospital, and the febrile patients with nonneutropenia were entrolled. The 96 patients were classified into three groups: 21 patients with bloodstream infection (BSI), 49 patients with localized bacterial infection (LBI), 26 patients with tumor fever (TF). The diagnostic values of PCT and CRP were analyzed for each group.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Results〖HTSS〗〓The study found that the PCT level and PCT/CRP ratio were significantly higher in BSI group and LBI group than in TF group. The patients with bloodstream infection had significantly higher CRP level than those with tumor fever, however, there was no statistical difference in patients with localized bacterial infection and tumor fever. PCT/CRP was the best test for discriminating tumor fever and infectious fever in terms of the area under the curve of the ROC curve. To discriminate between tumor fever and localized bacterial infection, at the cutoff of 0.005 5 for PCT/CRP, the sensitivity and specificity of PCT/CRP were 81.6% and 96.2%. To discriminate between tumor fever and bloodstream infection, at the cutoff of 0.005 0 for PCT/CRP, the sensitivity and specificity of PCT/CRP were 90.5% and 92.3%.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖HTSS〗〓The PCT level and PCT/CRP ratio were more useful parameters than CRP level for discriminating patients with tumor fever and infectious fever. Furthermore, PCT/CRP ratio was the best marker for discrimination between tumor fever and infectious fever.

Key words: lung neoplasms; fever; procalcitonin, Creactive protein