河北医科大学学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 508-512.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2024.05.003

• • 上一篇    下一篇

床旁超声联合肺泡动脉氧分压差在儿童脓毒性休克液体复苏中的临床应用

  

  1. 1.河北省儿童医院重症医学一科,河北 石家庄 050031;2.河北省儿童医院神经康复科,
    河北 石家庄 050031;3.河北省儿童医院急诊科,河北 石家庄 050031

  • 出版日期:2024-05-25 发布日期:2024-05-22
  • 作者简介:刘帅(1991-),女,河北石家庄人,河北省儿童医院主治医师,医学硕士研究生,从事儿科重症疾病诊治研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学科学研究重点课题计划(20220742)

Clinical application of bedside ultrasound combined with pulmonary arterial partial pressure of oxygen in septic shock children undergoing fluid resuscitation

  1. 1.The First Department of Intensive Care Unit, Hebei Children′s Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050031, 
    China; 2.Department of Neurological Rehabilitation, Hebei Children′s Hospital, Shijiazhuang 
    050031, China; 3.Department of Emergency, Hebei Children′s Hospital, 
    Shijiazhuang 050031, China

  • Online:2024-05-25 Published:2024-05-22

摘要: 目的 研究床旁超声联合肺泡动脉氧分压差(alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient,PA-aO2)在脓毒性休克患儿液体复苏方面的临床价值。
方法 选取河北省儿童医院重症医学一科收治的脓毒性休克患儿38例,采用随机数字表法分为常规组和试验组,每组19例。所有患儿入院后均给予初始抗休克(20 mL/kg醋酸钠林格液)、抗感染、呼吸支持等综合治疗。常规组在初始液体复苏后按照国际指南目标(早期目标导向治疗6 h目标)继续液体复苏,试验组在初始液体复苏后依据床旁超声及PA-aO2监测动态评估血流动力学,指导后续液体复苏。比较2组患儿的一般资料,液体复苏6、24、48 h的PA-aO2,液体复苏6 h后心率及平均动脉压,24 h乳酸清除率,48 h血管活性药物评分,48 h液体总入量,48 h后行血液净化治疗例数。
结果 2组患儿的性别、年龄、体重、预警评分、危重症评分、入院时的心率及平均动脉压、血乳酸、PA-aO2差异均无统计学意义;2组患儿液体复苏6、24、48 h的PA-aO2在组间、时点间、组间·时点间交互作用差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患儿液体复苏6 h〖KG*4〗后心率及平均动脉压、24 h乳酸清除率、48 h血管活性药物评分差异无统计学意义;试验组48 h液体总入量明显少于常规组,行血液净化例数少于常规组,其差异均有统计学意义。
结论 床旁超声联合、PA-aO2可以精准指导脓毒性休克患儿的液体管理,优化容量状态,减少液体入量,降低发生肺水肿的风险,避免血液净化有创治疗,减轻儿童痛苦,益于儿童。


关键词: 休克, 脓毒性, 超声检查, 肺泡动脉氧分压差

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical value of bedside ultrasound combined with alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (PA-aO2) in children with septic shock undergoing fluid resuscitation. 
Methods A total of 38 children with septic shock admitted to the First Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Hebei Children′s Hospital were selected and divided into conventional group (n=19) and experimental group (n=19) by random number table method. After admission, all the children were given comprehensive treatment including initial anti-shock (20 mL/kg sodium acetate ringer′s injection), anti-infecion treatment and respiratory support. The conventional group continued fluid resuscitation after initial fluid resuscitation according to the International Guideline for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock (6 h target of early target-oriented treatment), and the experimental group was given dynamic evaluation of hemodynamics after initial fluid resuscitation based on bedside ultrasound and PA-aO2 monitoring, to guide subsequent fluid resuscitation. General data, PA-aO2 at 6 h, 24 h and 48 h after fluid resuscitation and heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at 6 h after fluid resuscitaion, lactic acid clearance rate at 24 h after fluid resuscitaion,vasoactive drug score at 48 h after fluid resuscitaion, total fluid intake at 48 h after fluid resuscitaion, and the number of patients undergoing blood purification therapy at 48 h after fluid resuscitaion were compared between the two groups. 
Results There was no statistical significance in gender, age, weight, warning score, critical illness score, HR and MAP at admission, blood lactic acid and PA-aO2 in the two groups. The difference of interaction between groups, time points and time points between groups were statistically significant with respect to PA-aO2  at 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h after fluid resuscitation in the two groups (P<0.05). There was no statistical significance in HR, MAP, lactate clearance at 24 h after fluid resuscitation and vasoactive drug score at 48 h after fluid resuscitation. The total fluid intake at 48 h after fluid resuscitation in experimental group was significantly less than that in conventional group, and the number of patients undergoing blood purification therapy was less than that in conventional group, showing significant differences. 
Conclusion Bedside ultrasound combined with PA-aO2 can accurately guide fluid management in children with septic shock, optimize volume status, reduce fluid intake and the risk of pulmonary edema, avoid invasive treatment of blood purification, relieve pain and benefit children. 


Key words: shock, septic, ultrasonography, alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient