河北医科大学学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (7): 769-776.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2025.07.005

• • 上一篇    下一篇

宫颈癌同步放化疗预后MRI列线图模型的构建和验证

  

  1. 1.西安交通大学第一附属医院麻醉科,陕西 西安 710061;2.西安交通大学第二附属医院呼吸科,陕西 西安710004

  • 出版日期:2025-07-25 发布日期:2025-07-24
  • 作者简介:张露(1988-),女,陕西西安人,西安交通大学第一附属医院主管护师,医学学士,从事护理管理/人文护理/麻醉护理研究。

  • 基金资助:
    陕西省“高层次人才特殊支持计划”项目 (陕组通字〔2020〕44号)

Construction and validation of MRI-based nomograms for the prediction of prognosis after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer

  1. 1.Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi 
    Province, Xi′an 710061, China; 2.Department of Respiratory, the Second Affiliated Hospital of 
    Xi′an Jiaotong University, Shaanxi Province, Xi′an 710004, China

  • Online:2025-07-25 Published:2025-07-24

摘要: 目的 基于动态表观弥散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)变化率构建列线图模型预测宫颈癌同步放化疗(concurrent chemoradiotherapy,CCRT)后无进展生存期(progression-free survival,PFS)的临床价值。
方法 回顾性收集西安交通大学第一附属医院接受CCRT治疗的宫颈癌患者75例作为训练组,西安交通大学第二附属医院收集36例作为外部验证组。计算每例患者治疗前后2次的平均表观扩散系数的变化率[△ADCmean(%)]。绘制受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评估△ADCmean(%)预测肿瘤国际妇产科联盟(International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics,FIGO)降期的准确性。使用X-tile计算预后分层中△ADCmean(%)的最佳阈值,根据生存曲线评估高危组和低危组患者的3年PFS差异。采用多因素Cox比例风险回归模型在训练组确定与PFS相关的独立危险因素,并构建预后相关列线图模型,采用相同阈值对验证组进行预测。计算一致性指数(C-index,C-指数),并通过时间依赖性ROC曲线分析计算相关指标评价模型在训练组和验证组的判别能力。进行决策曲线(decision curve analysis,DCA)以评估△ADCmean(%)预测模型和列线图模型的临床适用性并量化阈值范围内的净收益。
结果 根据FIGO分期,CCRT治疗后肿瘤降期的患者PFS时间显著高于未降期患者(P=0.002)。X-tile获得△ADCmean(%)诊断预后的最佳阈值为40.8,生存曲线显示该阈值下3年内低风险人群PFS时间显著长于高风险人群(P=0.002),验证组取得相似结果(P=0.013)。多因素Cox回归分析结果显示,△ADCmean(%)、病理分级、主动脉旁淋巴结转移和盆腔淋巴结转移是影响患者PFS的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。训练组和验证组△ADCmean(%)预测宫颈癌患者3年PFS的C指数分别为0.750、0.691;联合临床模型的列线图预测PFS的C指数分别为0.861、0.727。DCA提示列线图模型预测3年PFS净获益高于单独ADCmean(%)模型,阈值范围在训练组和验证组分别为0.11~0.59和0.08~0.65。
结论 宫颈癌患者经CCRT治疗后肿瘤分期降低患者的PFS显著长于未退缩者,△ADCmean(%)在预测宫颈癌患者肿瘤是否降期中有明显优势。基于临床信息和△ADCmean(%)的列线图模型在预测宫颈癌患者经CCRT后降期和PFS方面具有较高的临床价值,可为宫颈癌患者的预后评估和个体化方案制定提供有力参考。


关键词: 宫颈肿瘤, 放化疗, 列线图

Abstract: Objective To predict the clinical value of nomograms based on the change rate in the dynamic apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for progression-free survival (PFS) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for cervical cancer. 
Methods A total of 75 patients with cervical cancer who underwent CCRT at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University were retrospectively enrolled as the training group, while 36 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi′an Jiaotong University were included as the external validation group. The mean change rate of ADC (△ADCmean [%]) before and after treatment was calculated for each patient. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted to assess the accuracy of △ADCmean (%) in predicting International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics(FIGO) downstaging. The optimal threshold of △ADCmean (%) for prognostic stratification was determined using X-tile, and the difference in 3-year PFS between high hrisk and low risk groups was evaluated using survival curves. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed in the training group to identify independent risk factors associated with PFS, and a prognostic nomogram model was constructed. The consistent threshold was applied to the validation group for prediction. The Concordance Index (C-index) was calculated, and time-dependent ROC curve analysis of relevant indicators was used to evaluate the discriminative ability of the model in both the training and validation groups. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to assess the clinical applicability of the △ADCmean (%) prediction model and the nomogram model, quantifying the net benefit within the threshold range. 
Results According to FIGO staging, patients with tumor downstaging after CCRT had significantly longer PFS compared with those without downstaging (P=0.002). The optimal threshold of △ADCmean (%) for prognostic stratification was 40.8 determined by X-tile. Survival curves demonstrated that the low risk group had significantly longer 3-year PFS than the high risk group at this threshold (P=0.002), with similar results observed in the validation group (P=0.013). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified △ADCmean (%), pathological grade, para-aortic lymph node metastasis, and pelvic lymph node metastasis as independent risk factors affecting PFS. The C-indices for predicting 3-year PFS using △ADCmean (%) in the training and validation groups were 0.75 and 0.691, respectively, while the C-indices for the combined nomogram model were 0.861 and 0.727, respectively. DCA showed that the nomogram model provided higher net benefit for predicting 3-year PFS compared with the △ADCmean (%) model alone, with threshold ranges of 0.11-0.59 in the training group and 0.08-0.65 in the validation group. 
Conclusion Among cervical cancer patients, those with tumor downstaging after CCRT treatment have significantly longer PFS than those without downstaging. △ADCmean (%) has obvious advantages in predicting presence or absence of tumor downstaging in cervical cancer patients. The nomogram model based on clinical information and △ADCmean (%) has high clinical value in predicting the downstaging and PFS of cervical cancer patients after CCRT, and can provide a strong reference for the prognosis evaluation and individualized treatment planning of cervical cancer patients. 


Key words: uterine cervical neoplasms, chemoradiotherapy, nomograms