河北医科大学学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 27-29,53.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2021.01.006

• • 上一篇    下一篇

TVT-E与TVT-O治疗压力性尿失禁的效果比较

  

  1. 1.邯郸钢铁集团有限责任公司职工医院泌尿外科,河北 邯郸 056001;2.河北医科大学第二医院泌尿外科,
    河北 石家庄 050000;3.河北省保定市第一中心医院泌尿外科,河北 保定 071000
  • 出版日期:2021-01-25 发布日期:2021-02-04
  • 作者简介:阚金龙(1978-),男,河北邯郸人,邯郸钢铁集团有限责任公司职工医院主治医师,医学学士,从事泌尿外科疾病诊治研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省医学科学研究课题计划(20200041,20200043);河北省重点研发计划项目(20377724D);河北省医学适用技术跟踪项目(G2018031)

Comparison of the efficacy of TVT-E and TVT-O in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

  1. 1.Department of Urology, Staff Hospital of Handan Iron and Steel Group Company, Hebei Province, 
    Handan 056001, China; 2.Department of Urinary Surgery, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical 
    University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China; 3.Department of Urinary Surgery, the First Central 
    Hospital of Baoding, Hebei Province, Baoding 071000, China
  • Online:2021-01-25 Published:2021-02-04

摘要: 目的  比较经耻骨后无张力尿道中段吊带(transobturator vaginal tape exact,TVT-E)和经闭孔无张力尿道中段吊带术(tension-free vaginal tape obturator,TVT-O)治疗女性压力性尿失禁(stress urinary incontinence,SUI)的临床效果及并发症。
方法  回顾性分析女性SUI患者159例的临床资料,根据治疗方法不同分为TVT-E组73例和TVT-O组86例,比较2组手术指标、临床疗效和并发症发生情况。
结果  TVT-E组手术时间明显长于TVT-O组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组术中出血量、住院时间及术后残尿量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组临床疗效和并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
结论  TVT-E与TVT-O手术效果及并发症相当,但TVT-E组手术时间较长,有膀胱穿孔风险,TVT-O术后复发患者可再次行TVT-E治疗。TVT-E手术方法简便,疗效确切,值得临床推广应用。


关键词: 尿失禁, 压力性;TVT-E;TVT-O

Abstract: Objective  To compare the clinical efficacy and complications of tension-free trans-obturator vaginal tape exact(TVT-E) and tension-free vaginal tape obturator(TVT-O) for female stress urinary incontinence(SUI). 
Methods  A retrospective analysis of 159 female SUI patients was performed. They were divided into TVT-E group(n=73) and TVT-O group(n=86) according to different treatment methods.Thesurgical indicators, clinical efficacy and complications were compared in the two groups. 
Results  The duration of operation was significantly longer in the TVT-E group than in the TVT-O group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative residual urine volume between the two groups(P>0.05). No significant difference was found in clinical efficacy and complication rate between the two groups(P>0.05).  
Conclusion  The TVT-E group and the TVT-O group had similar surgical effects and complications, but the TVT-E group had a longer duration of operation and a higher risk of bladder perforation, as compared withTVT-O group. Patients who had recurrence after TVT-O can undergo further TVT-E. The TVT-E is simple and effective, and it is worthy of clinical promotion.


Key words: urinary incontinence, stress; TVT-E, TVT-O