›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 398-398.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

透析开始时间对非糖尿病终末期肾病患者预后的影响

侯亮;李雪梅;刘千红;姚树青   

  1. 宣化钢铁公司职工医院肾内科,河北 张家口,075100
  • 发布日期:2015-04-25

YOU Yang;FENG Qian;XIA Yue;QI Guo-qing;ZHANG Yan;ZHANG Qing-wen

HOU Liang;LI Xue-mei;LIU Qian-hong;YAO Shu-qing   

  • Published:2015-04-25

摘要: 目的:探讨肾脏替代治疗(renal replacement therapy,RRT)开始时间对非糖尿病终末期肾病(non diabetic end stage renal disease,NDNESRD)患者临床预后的影响。方法选择首次行 RRT 的 NDNESRD 患者89例,根据开始 RRT 时估算的肾小球滤过率(estimated glomerular filtration rate,eGFR)将患者分为提前治疗组和延迟治疗组,以患者生存率为主要临床事件,以住院率以及心血管事件、血管通路并发症、透析模式转换和腹膜炎发生率为次要临床事件,随访5年。结果两组1、3、5年生存率差异无统计学意义(P =0.166、0.088、0.067)。两组住院率(35.7% vs 38.3%,P =0.667)、心血管事件发生率(14.3% vs 10.6%,P =0.089)、血管通路并发症发生率(21.2% vs 28.1%,P =0.682)及腹膜炎发生率(22.2% vs 26.7%,P =0.541)差异无统计学意义。结论早期开始RRT 对 NDNESRD 患者的临床预后没有明显的益处。

关键词: 肾病, 肾透析, 预后

Abstract: Objective To investigate the effect of initiation time on renal replacement therapy(RRT) for clinical prognosis of patients with non diabetic end stage renal disease (NDNESRD).Methods A total of 89 NDNESRD patients who started the first dialysis were classified into early-start group or late-start group according to estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR).The primary outcome was patient survival,and the secondary outcomes were hospitalization,cardiovascular events,vascular access complications,change of dialysis modality, and peritonitis.The follow-up period was five years.Results The survival rate showed no significant difference in the first,the third and the fifth years between the two groups(P =0.166, 0.088,0.067 ).Hospitalization (35.7% vs 38.3%,P = 0.667 ),cardiovascular events (14.3% vs 10.6%,P = 0.089),vascular access complications (21.2% vs 28.1%,P = 0.682)and peritonitis (22.2% vs 26.7%,P =0.541)were no difference between the two groups.Conclusion There was no significant clinical benefit comparing early versus late initiation of RRT.

Key words: nephrosis, renal dialysis, prognosis

中图分类号: