河北医科大学学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 1068-1073.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2023.09.015

• • 上一篇    下一篇

体外循环心内直视手术中脑电双频指数监测麻醉深度的效果观察

  

  1. 广西省百色市人民医院麻醉科,广西 百色 533000
  • 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-10-12
  • 作者简介:黄红梅(1983-),女,壮族,广西天等人,广西省百色市人民医院副主任医师,医学硕士,从事临床麻醉方向研究。
  • 基金资助:
    广西壮族自治区卫生健康委员会自筹经费科研课题(Z20201086)

Effect of monitoring the depth of anesthesia by bispectral index during open heart surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, the People′s Hospital of Baise City, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Baise 533000, China
  • Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-10-12

摘要: 目的  观察体外循环心内直视手术中脑电双频指数(bispectral index,BIS)监测麻醉深度的效果。
方法  选取百色市人民医院行体外循环下心内直视手术患者40例,随机分为2组(n=20)。麻醉诱导2组均由静脉通道给予咪达唑仑0.05 mg/kg、芬太尼10 μg/kg、苯磺顺阿曲库铵0.3 mg/kg、依托咪酯0.3 mg/kg静推,诱导期血压下降给予升压药。观察记录气管插管即刻(T0)、锯胸骨即刻(T1)、体外循环开始10 min(T2)、鼻温最低时(T3)、复温至36度时(T4)、体外循环停止时(T5)各时点BIS值。术中麻醉维持期2组均持续泵注0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1的右美托咪定,切皮及锯胸骨前按10 μg/kg追加芬太尼,观察组观察组丙泊酚泵注剂量通过BIS值的变化进行调整,术中维持BIS值40~60。对照组也使用BIS监测,但BIS值对主麻医师隐藏,术中用药剂量由麻醉医师根据传统标准视血压心率进行调整,术后收集数据者从监护记录调取对照组术中BIS值,2组血压通过血管活性药泵注尽量维持在不高或不低于术前基础值的20%以内。记录整个手术过程丙泊酚总用量、血管活性药用量、芬太尼总用量,记录患者麻醉时间、手术时间、升主动脉阻断时间、体外循环转机时间、术后气管拔管时间、术后转出监护室时间、术后3 d随访患者是否存在与手术相关的记忆以及术后住院时间。
结果  2组术中芬太尼总用量比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术中丙泊酚总用量观察组小于对照组,术中血管活性药用量少于对照组(P<0.05),观察组各时点BIS值均高于对照组,2组BIS值均随时间的延长先降低后升高后平稳,组间、时点间、组间·时点间交互作用差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察组气管拔管时间、住院时间短于对照组(P<0.05),术后转出CSICU时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
结论  体外循环下心内直视手术麻醉中应用BIS监测麻醉深度具有重要价值,可在保障手术顺利进行前提下,通过BIS监测指导下个体化用药,减少麻醉药物应用,维持血流动力学稳定。


关键词: 体外循环, 麻醉, 心脏手术, 意识监护仪

Abstract: Objective  To observe the effect of monitoring the depth of anesthesia by bispectral index (BIS) during open heart surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass. 
Methods  We selected 40 patients who underwent openheart surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass in People′s Hospital of Baise City, and divided them into two groups randomly, with 20 patients in each group. During anesthesia induction, 0.05 mg/kg of midazolam, 10 μg/kg of fentanyl, 0.3 mg/kg of cis-atracurium and 0.3 mg/kg of etomidate were given intravenously in both groups, and booster drugs were given to increase blood pressure if blood pressure dropped during induction period. The BIS values were observed and recorded at different time points, including immediately after intubation (T0), immediately after sternotomy (T1), at 10 min after the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (T2), at the time of the lowest nasal temperature (T3), the time of rewarming to 36 degrees (T4), the time of stopping cardiopulmonary bypass (T5). 0.5 μg·kg-1·h-1 dexmedetomidine was continuously pumped into both groups during the maintenance period of anesthesia, and 10 μg/kg of fentanyl was supplemented before skin cutting and sternotomy. In the observation group B, the dosage of propofol was adjusted by the change of BIS value, and the BIS value was maintained in the range of 40-60 during the operation. In the control group, BIS monitoring was also used but the chief anesthesiologist was blinded to the BIS values. The intraoperative dosage was adjusted by the anesthesiologist according to the traditional standard of blood pressure and heart rate. The intraoperative BIS values of the control group were collected from the monitoring records after the operation. The blood pressure of the two groups was kept within 20% of the preoperative basic value through the pump injection of vasoactive drugs. In this study, all of the key variables were recorded in detail, including the total dosage of propofol, vasoactive drugs and fentanyl; duration of anesthesia, duration of operation, the blocking time of ascending aorta, the time before establishing cardiopulmonary bypass, the time of postoperative extubation and the time totransfer out of cardiosurgery intensive care unit (CSICU) after surgery, the intraoperative memory of the patients within 3 days after the operations, and the date of postoperative discharge. 
Results  There was no statistically significant difference in the total amount of fentanyl used during surgery between two groups (P>0.05). The total amount of propofol used during surgery in the observation group was smaller than that in the control group, and the amount of vasoactive drugs used during surgery was smaller than that in the control group (P<0.05). The BIS values of the observation group were higher than those in the control group at all time points. The BIS values of both groups first decreased, and then increased with time, and then stabilized between groups, and the differences of interaction between groups,time points, and time points between groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). The observation group had shorter time to tracheal extubation and length of hospitalization than the control group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the time to transfer out of CSICU after surgery (P>0.05). 
Conclusion  The application of BIS in monitoring the depth of anesthesia during open heart surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass is of great value. It can reduce the use of narcotic and maintain hemodynamic stability through individualized medication under the guidance of BIS monitoring on the premise of ensuring the smooth operation. 


Key words: cardiopulmonary bypass, anesthesia, cardiac surgery, consciousness monitors