河北医科大学学报

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声弹性成像技术鉴别诊断子宫肌瘤、腺肌瘤应用价值

  

  1. 1.河北医科大学第四医院妇产超声科，河北 石家庄 050011；2.河北省邯郸市第一医院功能科，河北 邯郸 056002
  • 出版日期:2017-03-25 发布日期:2017-03-29
  • 基金资助:
    张路平(1987-),女，河北武安人，河北省邯郸市第一医院医师，医学硕士，从事超声医学诊断研究。

The application value of ultrasonic elastosonography for differential diagnosis of hysteromyoma and adenomyoma#br#

  1. 1.Department of  Gynecological Ultrasound, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University,
    Shijiazhuang 050011， China; 2.Department of Function, the First Hospital of
    Handan City, Hebei Handan, 056002, China
  • Online:2017-03-25 Published:2017-03-29

HTML

PDF (PC)

157

摘要： ［摘要］〓〖HJ1.78mm〗
〖HTH〗目的〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗比较常规超声和点定量弹性成像技术鉴别诊断子宫肌瘤与腺肌瘤的敏感度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值，寻求点定量弹性成像技术区分二者的量化标准。
〖HTH〗方法〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗使用常规超声和点定量弹性成像技术对121例子宫局灶性占位患者和98例正常体检女性进行检查。结合病理，对2种诊断方法进行评价，求出点定量弹性成像技术鉴别肌瘤与腺肌瘤的截断值。
〖HTH〗结果〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗点定量弹性成像技术较常规超声，敏感度略低，但是特异度、准确度和阳性预测值均高于常规超声检查。与正常组比较，肌瘤的ElastPQ值明显升高，腺肌瘤明显降低，差异有统计学意义（P＜005）。点定量弹性成像技术鉴别诊断肌瘤、腺肌瘤最佳截断值为14.03 kPa。
〖HTH〗结论〖HTSS〗〖KG*2〗点定量弹性成像技术可以提供组织硬度的量化指标，有助于子宫肌瘤和腺肌瘤的鉴别诊断。

关键词: 弹性成像技术, 肌瘤, 子宫, 腺肌瘤

Abstract: ［Abstract］ Objective〖HTSS〗〓To compare the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy rate, positive predictive value, negative of conventional ultrasonography and elasticity point quantification(ElastPQ) technique  in the differential diagnosis of hysteromyoma and  adenomyoma， and to find out the quantitative criteria.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Methods〖HTSS〗〓One hundred and twentyone paitients with mass in uterus and 98 normal people were underwent both conventional ultrasonography and elasticity point quantification technique detection. Two kinds of diagnostic methods were evaluated, and the quantitative elasticity imaging technique was used to identify the cutoff value of hysteromyoma and adenomyoma.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Results〖HTSS〗〓The sensitivity of ElastPQ was lower than conventional ultrasonography while the specificity, accuracy rate, positive predictive value were higher. Compared with the  normal people，ElastPQ  value of hysteromyoma were higher while  adenomyoma were  lower. The ElastPQ  value among  hysteromyoma, adenomyoma and normal uterus had significant difference(P＜005). The best cutoff value of differentiate hysteromyoma and adenomyoma was 14.03 kPa.
〖HTH〗〖WTHZ〗Conclusion〖HTSS〗〓ElastPQ technique can help differentiate hysteromyoma from adenomyoma by offering quantitative criteria for stiffness of tissue.

Key words: elasticity imaging techniques, fibroids, uterine, adenomyoma

版权所有 © 《河北医科大学学报》编辑部
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发